From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tony Lindgren Subject: Re: [PATCH] OMAP4: McBSP: Clear rx_irq at probe time Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 06:35:43 -0700 Message-ID: <20110613133542.GD3352@atomide.com> References: <1305628420-10592-1-git-send-email-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> <201105181539.46959.peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> <20110531075701.GN11352@atomide.com> <201106081051.27234.peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mho-04-ewr.mailhop.org ([204.13.248.74]:22872 "EHLO mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752961Ab1FMNfs (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Jun 2011 09:35:48 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201106081051.27234.peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Peter Ujfalusi Cc: Jarkko Nikula , "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" , "Girdwood, Liam" , "ABRAHAM, KISHON VIJAY" * Peter Ujfalusi [110608 00:46]: > Hi Tony, > > On Tuesday 31 May 2011 10:57:02 Tony Lindgren wrote: > > Sure, but that's the only option we have to merge any new code. > > So this patch will be not taken (even if without this patch OMAP4 McBSP is > broken), unless we move the McBSP code out from plat-omap? > > I have discussed with Jarkko, and internally about the mcbsp code move. This > will certainly take some time to figure out a sane way to do this. > To be hones I would be surprised if we can do this for 3.1... Sure we can merge fixes, but let's get the move done before adding new features. Regards, Tony