public inbox for linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: mark gross <markgross@thegnar.org>
To: jean.pihet@newoldbits.com
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>,
	markgross@thegnar.org,
	Linux PM mailing list <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>,
	Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>,
	Todd Poynor <toddpoynor@google.com>, Jean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/15] PM QoS: re-organize data structs
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 19:56:29 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110813025629.GD639@gvim.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1313075212-8366-5-git-send-email-j-pihet@ti.com>

On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 05:06:41PM +0200, jean.pihet@newoldbits.com wrote:
> From: Jean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com>
> 
> In preparation for the per-device constratins support, re-organize
> the data strctures:
> - add a struct pm_qos_constraints which contains the constraints
> related data
> - update struct pm_qos_object contents to the PM QoS internal object
> data. Add a pointer to struct pm_qos_constraints
> - update the internal code to use the new data structs.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/pm_qos.h |   19 ++++++++++
>  kernel/power/qos.c     |   90 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
>  2 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/pm_qos.h b/include/linux/pm_qos.h
> index 6b0968f..9772311 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pm_qos.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pm_qos.h
> @@ -25,6 +25,25 @@ struct pm_qos_request {
>  	int pm_qos_class;
>  };
>  
> +enum pm_qos_type {
> +	PM_QOS_UNITIALIZED,
what is this for?

> +	PM_QOS_MAX,		/* return the largest value */
> +	PM_QOS_MIN		/* return the smallest value */
> +};
> +
> +/*
> + * Note: The lockless read path depends on the CPU accessing
> + * target_value atomically.  Atomic access is only guaranteed on all CPU
> + * types linux supports for 32 bit quantites
> + */
> +struct pm_qos_constraints {
> +	struct plist_head list;
> +	s32 target_value;	/* Do not change to 64 bit */
> +	s32 default_value;
> +	enum pm_qos_type type;
> +	struct blocking_notifier_head *notifiers;
> +};
> +
>  #ifdef CONFIG_PM
>  void pm_qos_add_request(struct pm_qos_request *req, int pm_qos_class,
>  			s32 value);
> diff --git a/kernel/power/qos.c b/kernel/power/qos.c
> index fa9a090..66e8d6f 100644
> --- a/kernel/power/qos.c
> +++ b/kernel/power/qos.c
> @@ -49,62 +49,54 @@
>   * or pm_qos_object list and pm_qos_objects need to happen with pm_qos_lock
>   * held, taken with _irqsave.  One lock to rule them all
>   */
> -enum pm_qos_type {
> -	PM_QOS_MAX,		/* return the largest value */
> -	PM_QOS_MIN		/* return the smallest value */
> -};
> -
> -/*
> - * Note: The lockless read path depends on the CPU accessing
> - * target_value atomically.  Atomic access is only guaranteed on all CPU
> - * types linux supports for 32 bit quantites
> - */
>  struct pm_qos_object {
> -	struct plist_head constraints;
> -	struct blocking_notifier_head *notifiers;
> +	struct pm_qos_constraints *constraints;
>  	struct miscdevice pm_qos_power_miscdev;
>  	char *name;
> -	s32 target_value;	/* Do not change to 64 bit */
> -	s32 default_value;
> -	enum pm_qos_type type;
>  };
>  
>  static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(pm_qos_lock);
>  
>  static struct pm_qos_object null_pm_qos;
> +
>  static BLOCKING_NOTIFIER_HEAD(cpu_dma_lat_notifier);
> -static struct pm_qos_object cpu_dma_pm_qos = {
> -	.constraints = PLIST_HEAD_INIT(cpu_dma_pm_qos.constraints, pm_qos_lock),
> -	.notifiers = &cpu_dma_lat_notifier,
> -	.name = "cpu_dma_latency",
> +static struct pm_qos_constraints cpu_dma_constraints = {
> +	.list = PLIST_HEAD_INIT(cpu_dma_constraints.list, pm_qos_lock),
>  	.target_value = PM_QOS_CPU_DMA_LAT_DEFAULT_VALUE,
>  	.default_value = PM_QOS_CPU_DMA_LAT_DEFAULT_VALUE,
>  	.type = PM_QOS_MIN,
> +	.notifiers = &cpu_dma_lat_notifier,
> +};
> +static struct pm_qos_object cpu_dma_pm_qos = {
> +	.constraints = &cpu_dma_constraints,
> +	.name = "cpu_dma_latency",
>  };
>  
>  static BLOCKING_NOTIFIER_HEAD(network_lat_notifier);
> -static struct pm_qos_object network_lat_pm_qos = {
> -	.constraints = PLIST_HEAD_INIT(network_lat_pm_qos.constraints,
> -				       pm_qos_lock),
> -	.notifiers = &network_lat_notifier,
> -	.name = "network_latency",
> +static struct pm_qos_constraints network_lat_constraints = {
> +	.list = PLIST_HEAD_INIT(network_lat_constraints.list, pm_qos_lock),
>  	.target_value = PM_QOS_NETWORK_LAT_DEFAULT_VALUE,
>  	.default_value = PM_QOS_NETWORK_LAT_DEFAULT_VALUE,
> -	.type = PM_QOS_MIN
> +	.type = PM_QOS_MIN,
> +	.notifiers = &network_lat_notifier,
> +};
> +static struct pm_qos_object network_lat_pm_qos = {
> +	.constraints = &network_lat_constraints,
> +	.name = "network_latency",
>  };
> -
>  
>  static BLOCKING_NOTIFIER_HEAD(network_throughput_notifier);
> -static struct pm_qos_object network_throughput_pm_qos = {
> -	.constraints = PLIST_HEAD_INIT(network_throughput_pm_qos.constraints,
> -				       pm_qos_lock),
> -	.notifiers = &network_throughput_notifier,
> -	.name = "network_throughput",
> +static struct pm_qos_constraints network_tput_constraints = {
> +	.list = PLIST_HEAD_INIT(network_tput_constraints.list, pm_qos_lock),
>  	.target_value = PM_QOS_NETWORK_THROUGHPUT_DEFAULT_VALUE,
>  	.default_value = PM_QOS_NETWORK_THROUGHPUT_DEFAULT_VALUE,
>  	.type = PM_QOS_MAX,
> +	.notifiers = &network_throughput_notifier,
> +};
> +static struct pm_qos_object network_throughput_pm_qos = {
> +	.constraints = &network_tput_constraints,
> +	.name = "network_throughput",
>  };
> -
>  
>  static struct pm_qos_object *pm_qos_array[] = {
>  	&null_pm_qos,
> @@ -131,15 +123,15 @@ static const struct file_operations pm_qos_power_fops = {
>  /* unlocked internal variant */
>  static inline int pm_qos_get_value(struct pm_qos_object *o)
>  {
> -	if (plist_head_empty(&o->constraints))
> -		return o->default_value;
> +	if (plist_head_empty(&o->constraints->list))
> +		return o->constraints->default_value;
>  
> -	switch (o->type) {
> +	switch (o->constraints->type) {
>  	case PM_QOS_MIN:
> -		return plist_first(&o->constraints)->prio;
> +		return plist_first(&o->constraints->list)->prio;
>  
>  	case PM_QOS_MAX:
> -		return plist_last(&o->constraints)->prio;
> +		return plist_last(&o->constraints->list)->prio;
>  
>  	default:
>  		/* runtime check for not using enum */
> @@ -149,12 +141,12 @@ static inline int pm_qos_get_value(struct pm_qos_object *o)
>  
>  static inline s32 pm_qos_read_value(struct pm_qos_object *o)
>  {
> -	return o->target_value;
> +	return o->constraints->target_value;
>  }
>  
>  static inline void pm_qos_set_value(struct pm_qos_object *o, s32 value)
>  {
> -	o->target_value = value;
> +	o->constraints->target_value = value;
>  }
>  
>  static void update_target(struct pm_qos_object *o, struct plist_node *node,
> @@ -172,20 +164,20 @@ static void update_target(struct pm_qos_object *o, struct plist_node *node,
>  		 * with new value and add, then see if the extremal
>  		 * changed
>  		 */
> -		plist_del(node, &o->constraints);
> +		plist_del(node, &o->constraints->list);
>  		plist_node_init(node, value);
> -		plist_add(node, &o->constraints);
> +		plist_add(node, &o->constraints->list);
>  	} else if (del) {
> -		plist_del(node, &o->constraints);
> +		plist_del(node, &o->constraints->list);
>  	} else {
> -		plist_add(node, &o->constraints);
> +		plist_add(node, &o->constraints->list);
>  	}
>  	curr_value = pm_qos_get_value(o);
>  	pm_qos_set_value(o, curr_value);
>  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pm_qos_lock, flags);
>  
>  	if (prev_value != curr_value)
> -		blocking_notifier_call_chain(o->notifiers,
> +		blocking_notifier_call_chain(o->constraints->notifiers,
>  					     (unsigned long)curr_value,
>  					     NULL);
>  }
> @@ -232,7 +224,7 @@ void pm_qos_add_request(struct pm_qos_request *req,
>  		return;
>  	}
>  	if (value == PM_QOS_DEFAULT_VALUE)
> -		new_value = o->default_value;
> +		new_value = o->constraints->default_value;
>  	else
>  		new_value = value;
>  	plist_node_init(&req->node, new_value);
> @@ -268,7 +260,7 @@ void pm_qos_update_request(struct pm_qos_request *req,
>  	o = pm_qos_array[req->pm_qos_class];
>  
>  	if (new_value == PM_QOS_DEFAULT_VALUE)
> -		temp = o->default_value;
> +		temp = o->constraints->default_value;
>  	else
>  		temp = new_value;
>  
> @@ -317,7 +309,8 @@ int pm_qos_add_notifier(int pm_qos_class, struct notifier_block *notifier)
>  	int retval;
>  
>  	retval = blocking_notifier_chain_register(
> -			pm_qos_array[pm_qos_class]->notifiers, notifier);
> +			pm_qos_array[pm_qos_class]->constraints->notifiers,
> +			notifier);
>  
>  	return retval;
>  }
> @@ -336,7 +329,8 @@ int pm_qos_remove_notifier(int pm_qos_class, struct notifier_block *notifier)
>  	int retval;
>  
>  	retval = blocking_notifier_chain_unregister(
> -			pm_qos_array[pm_qos_class]->notifiers, notifier);
> +			pm_qos_array[pm_qos_class]->constraints->notifiers,
> +			notifier);
>  
>  	return retval;
>  }
> -- 
> 1.7.2.5
>

looks ok but I'm wondering what the uninititalized qos type is for.

--mark


  reply	other threads:[~2011-08-13  2:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-08-11 15:06 [PATCH v4 00/15] PM QoS: add a per-device latency constraints class jean.pihet
2011-08-11 15:06 ` [PATCH 01/15] PM QoS: move and rename the implementation files jean.pihet
2011-08-13  2:47   ` mark gross
2011-08-11 15:06 ` [PATCH 02/15] PM QoS: minor clean-ups jean.pihet
2011-08-13  2:48   ` mark gross
2011-08-11 15:06 ` [PATCH 03/15] PM QoS: code re-organization jean.pihet
2011-08-13  2:50   ` mark gross
2011-08-11 15:06 ` [PATCH 04/15] PM QoS: re-organize data structs jean.pihet
2011-08-13  2:56   ` mark gross [this message]
2011-08-13 20:58     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-08-14  8:29       ` Jean Pihet
2011-08-14 13:34         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-08-11 15:06 ` [PATCH 05/15] PM QoS: generalize and export the constraints management code jean.pihet
2011-08-13  3:09   ` mark gross
2011-08-13 20:34     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-08-14  8:25       ` Jean Pihet
2011-08-14 13:37         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-08-16  4:08           ` mark gross
2011-08-16  6:44             ` Jean Pihet
2011-08-16 17:45               ` mark gross
2011-08-16 18:01                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-08-11 15:06 ` [PATCH 06/15] PM QoS: implement the per-device PM QoS constraints jean.pihet
2011-08-13  3:16   ` mark gross
2011-08-13 21:08   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-08-14  8:50     ` Jean Pihet
2011-08-14 13:51       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-08-11 15:06 ` [PATCH 07/15] PM QoS: add a global notification mechanism for the device constraints jean.pihet
2011-08-14 21:50   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-08-16  9:58     ` Jean Pihet
2011-08-11 15:06 ` [PATCH 08/15] OMAP: convert I2C driver to PM QoS for latency constraints jean.pihet
2011-08-11 15:06 ` [PATCH 09/15] OMAP: PM: create a PM layer plugin for per-device constraints jean.pihet
2011-08-11 15:06 ` [PATCH 10/15] OMAP2+: powerdomain: control power domains next state jean.pihet
2011-08-11 15:06 ` [PATCH 11/15] OMAP3: powerdomain data: add wake-up latency figures jean.pihet
2011-08-11 15:06 ` [PATCH 12/15] OMAP4: " jean.pihet
2011-08-11 15:06 ` [PATCH 13/15] OMAP2+: omap_hwmod: manage the wake-up latency constraints jean.pihet
2011-08-11 15:06 ` [PATCH 14/15] OMAP: PM CONSTRAINTS: implement the devices " jean.pihet
2011-08-11 15:06 ` [PATCH 15/15] OMAP2+: cpuidle only influences the MPU state jean.pihet
2011-08-12  8:02 ` [PATCH v4 00/15] PM QoS: add a per-device latency constraints class Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-08-12 11:56   ` Jean Pihet
2011-08-12 21:56     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-08-14  8:51       ` Jean Pihet
2011-08-14 13:53         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-08-16 13:43 [PATCH v5 00/15] PM QoS: add a per-device latency constraints framework jean.pihet
2011-08-16 13:43 ` [PATCH 04/15] PM QoS: re-organize data structs jean.pihet

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20110813025629.GD639@gvim.org \
    --to=markgross@thegnar.org \
    --cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --cc=j-pihet@ti.com \
    --cc=jean.pihet@newoldbits.com \
    --cc=khilman@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
    --cc=paul@pwsan.com \
    --cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
    --cc=toddpoynor@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox