From: mark gross <markgross@thegnar.org>
To: jean.pihet@newoldbits.com
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>,
markgross@thegnar.org,
Linux PM mailing list <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>,
Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>,
Todd Poynor <toddpoynor@google.com>, Jean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/15] PM QoS: re-organize data structs
Date: Fri, 12 Aug 2011 19:56:29 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110813025629.GD639@gvim.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1313075212-8366-5-git-send-email-j-pihet@ti.com>
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 05:06:41PM +0200, jean.pihet@newoldbits.com wrote:
> From: Jean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com>
>
> In preparation for the per-device constratins support, re-organize
> the data strctures:
> - add a struct pm_qos_constraints which contains the constraints
> related data
> - update struct pm_qos_object contents to the PM QoS internal object
> data. Add a pointer to struct pm_qos_constraints
> - update the internal code to use the new data structs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com>
> ---
> include/linux/pm_qos.h | 19 ++++++++++
> kernel/power/qos.c | 90 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
> 2 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/pm_qos.h b/include/linux/pm_qos.h
> index 6b0968f..9772311 100644
> --- a/include/linux/pm_qos.h
> +++ b/include/linux/pm_qos.h
> @@ -25,6 +25,25 @@ struct pm_qos_request {
> int pm_qos_class;
> };
>
> +enum pm_qos_type {
> + PM_QOS_UNITIALIZED,
what is this for?
> + PM_QOS_MAX, /* return the largest value */
> + PM_QOS_MIN /* return the smallest value */
> +};
> +
> +/*
> + * Note: The lockless read path depends on the CPU accessing
> + * target_value atomically. Atomic access is only guaranteed on all CPU
> + * types linux supports for 32 bit quantites
> + */
> +struct pm_qos_constraints {
> + struct plist_head list;
> + s32 target_value; /* Do not change to 64 bit */
> + s32 default_value;
> + enum pm_qos_type type;
> + struct blocking_notifier_head *notifiers;
> +};
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_PM
> void pm_qos_add_request(struct pm_qos_request *req, int pm_qos_class,
> s32 value);
> diff --git a/kernel/power/qos.c b/kernel/power/qos.c
> index fa9a090..66e8d6f 100644
> --- a/kernel/power/qos.c
> +++ b/kernel/power/qos.c
> @@ -49,62 +49,54 @@
> * or pm_qos_object list and pm_qos_objects need to happen with pm_qos_lock
> * held, taken with _irqsave. One lock to rule them all
> */
> -enum pm_qos_type {
> - PM_QOS_MAX, /* return the largest value */
> - PM_QOS_MIN /* return the smallest value */
> -};
> -
> -/*
> - * Note: The lockless read path depends on the CPU accessing
> - * target_value atomically. Atomic access is only guaranteed on all CPU
> - * types linux supports for 32 bit quantites
> - */
> struct pm_qos_object {
> - struct plist_head constraints;
> - struct blocking_notifier_head *notifiers;
> + struct pm_qos_constraints *constraints;
> struct miscdevice pm_qos_power_miscdev;
> char *name;
> - s32 target_value; /* Do not change to 64 bit */
> - s32 default_value;
> - enum pm_qos_type type;
> };
>
> static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(pm_qos_lock);
>
> static struct pm_qos_object null_pm_qos;
> +
> static BLOCKING_NOTIFIER_HEAD(cpu_dma_lat_notifier);
> -static struct pm_qos_object cpu_dma_pm_qos = {
> - .constraints = PLIST_HEAD_INIT(cpu_dma_pm_qos.constraints, pm_qos_lock),
> - .notifiers = &cpu_dma_lat_notifier,
> - .name = "cpu_dma_latency",
> +static struct pm_qos_constraints cpu_dma_constraints = {
> + .list = PLIST_HEAD_INIT(cpu_dma_constraints.list, pm_qos_lock),
> .target_value = PM_QOS_CPU_DMA_LAT_DEFAULT_VALUE,
> .default_value = PM_QOS_CPU_DMA_LAT_DEFAULT_VALUE,
> .type = PM_QOS_MIN,
> + .notifiers = &cpu_dma_lat_notifier,
> +};
> +static struct pm_qos_object cpu_dma_pm_qos = {
> + .constraints = &cpu_dma_constraints,
> + .name = "cpu_dma_latency",
> };
>
> static BLOCKING_NOTIFIER_HEAD(network_lat_notifier);
> -static struct pm_qos_object network_lat_pm_qos = {
> - .constraints = PLIST_HEAD_INIT(network_lat_pm_qos.constraints,
> - pm_qos_lock),
> - .notifiers = &network_lat_notifier,
> - .name = "network_latency",
> +static struct pm_qos_constraints network_lat_constraints = {
> + .list = PLIST_HEAD_INIT(network_lat_constraints.list, pm_qos_lock),
> .target_value = PM_QOS_NETWORK_LAT_DEFAULT_VALUE,
> .default_value = PM_QOS_NETWORK_LAT_DEFAULT_VALUE,
> - .type = PM_QOS_MIN
> + .type = PM_QOS_MIN,
> + .notifiers = &network_lat_notifier,
> +};
> +static struct pm_qos_object network_lat_pm_qos = {
> + .constraints = &network_lat_constraints,
> + .name = "network_latency",
> };
> -
>
> static BLOCKING_NOTIFIER_HEAD(network_throughput_notifier);
> -static struct pm_qos_object network_throughput_pm_qos = {
> - .constraints = PLIST_HEAD_INIT(network_throughput_pm_qos.constraints,
> - pm_qos_lock),
> - .notifiers = &network_throughput_notifier,
> - .name = "network_throughput",
> +static struct pm_qos_constraints network_tput_constraints = {
> + .list = PLIST_HEAD_INIT(network_tput_constraints.list, pm_qos_lock),
> .target_value = PM_QOS_NETWORK_THROUGHPUT_DEFAULT_VALUE,
> .default_value = PM_QOS_NETWORK_THROUGHPUT_DEFAULT_VALUE,
> .type = PM_QOS_MAX,
> + .notifiers = &network_throughput_notifier,
> +};
> +static struct pm_qos_object network_throughput_pm_qos = {
> + .constraints = &network_tput_constraints,
> + .name = "network_throughput",
> };
> -
>
> static struct pm_qos_object *pm_qos_array[] = {
> &null_pm_qos,
> @@ -131,15 +123,15 @@ static const struct file_operations pm_qos_power_fops = {
> /* unlocked internal variant */
> static inline int pm_qos_get_value(struct pm_qos_object *o)
> {
> - if (plist_head_empty(&o->constraints))
> - return o->default_value;
> + if (plist_head_empty(&o->constraints->list))
> + return o->constraints->default_value;
>
> - switch (o->type) {
> + switch (o->constraints->type) {
> case PM_QOS_MIN:
> - return plist_first(&o->constraints)->prio;
> + return plist_first(&o->constraints->list)->prio;
>
> case PM_QOS_MAX:
> - return plist_last(&o->constraints)->prio;
> + return plist_last(&o->constraints->list)->prio;
>
> default:
> /* runtime check for not using enum */
> @@ -149,12 +141,12 @@ static inline int pm_qos_get_value(struct pm_qos_object *o)
>
> static inline s32 pm_qos_read_value(struct pm_qos_object *o)
> {
> - return o->target_value;
> + return o->constraints->target_value;
> }
>
> static inline void pm_qos_set_value(struct pm_qos_object *o, s32 value)
> {
> - o->target_value = value;
> + o->constraints->target_value = value;
> }
>
> static void update_target(struct pm_qos_object *o, struct plist_node *node,
> @@ -172,20 +164,20 @@ static void update_target(struct pm_qos_object *o, struct plist_node *node,
> * with new value and add, then see if the extremal
> * changed
> */
> - plist_del(node, &o->constraints);
> + plist_del(node, &o->constraints->list);
> plist_node_init(node, value);
> - plist_add(node, &o->constraints);
> + plist_add(node, &o->constraints->list);
> } else if (del) {
> - plist_del(node, &o->constraints);
> + plist_del(node, &o->constraints->list);
> } else {
> - plist_add(node, &o->constraints);
> + plist_add(node, &o->constraints->list);
> }
> curr_value = pm_qos_get_value(o);
> pm_qos_set_value(o, curr_value);
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pm_qos_lock, flags);
>
> if (prev_value != curr_value)
> - blocking_notifier_call_chain(o->notifiers,
> + blocking_notifier_call_chain(o->constraints->notifiers,
> (unsigned long)curr_value,
> NULL);
> }
> @@ -232,7 +224,7 @@ void pm_qos_add_request(struct pm_qos_request *req,
> return;
> }
> if (value == PM_QOS_DEFAULT_VALUE)
> - new_value = o->default_value;
> + new_value = o->constraints->default_value;
> else
> new_value = value;
> plist_node_init(&req->node, new_value);
> @@ -268,7 +260,7 @@ void pm_qos_update_request(struct pm_qos_request *req,
> o = pm_qos_array[req->pm_qos_class];
>
> if (new_value == PM_QOS_DEFAULT_VALUE)
> - temp = o->default_value;
> + temp = o->constraints->default_value;
> else
> temp = new_value;
>
> @@ -317,7 +309,8 @@ int pm_qos_add_notifier(int pm_qos_class, struct notifier_block *notifier)
> int retval;
>
> retval = blocking_notifier_chain_register(
> - pm_qos_array[pm_qos_class]->notifiers, notifier);
> + pm_qos_array[pm_qos_class]->constraints->notifiers,
> + notifier);
>
> return retval;
> }
> @@ -336,7 +329,8 @@ int pm_qos_remove_notifier(int pm_qos_class, struct notifier_block *notifier)
> int retval;
>
> retval = blocking_notifier_chain_unregister(
> - pm_qos_array[pm_qos_class]->notifiers, notifier);
> + pm_qos_array[pm_qos_class]->constraints->notifiers,
> + notifier);
>
> return retval;
> }
> --
> 1.7.2.5
>
looks ok but I'm wondering what the uninititalized qos type is for.
--mark
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-13 2:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-11 15:06 [PATCH v4 00/15] PM QoS: add a per-device latency constraints class jean.pihet
2011-08-11 15:06 ` [PATCH 01/15] PM QoS: move and rename the implementation files jean.pihet
2011-08-13 2:47 ` mark gross
2011-08-11 15:06 ` [PATCH 02/15] PM QoS: minor clean-ups jean.pihet
2011-08-13 2:48 ` mark gross
2011-08-11 15:06 ` [PATCH 03/15] PM QoS: code re-organization jean.pihet
2011-08-13 2:50 ` mark gross
2011-08-11 15:06 ` [PATCH 04/15] PM QoS: re-organize data structs jean.pihet
2011-08-13 2:56 ` mark gross [this message]
2011-08-13 20:58 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-08-14 8:29 ` Jean Pihet
2011-08-14 13:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-08-11 15:06 ` [PATCH 05/15] PM QoS: generalize and export the constraints management code jean.pihet
2011-08-13 3:09 ` mark gross
2011-08-13 20:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-08-14 8:25 ` Jean Pihet
2011-08-14 13:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-08-16 4:08 ` mark gross
2011-08-16 6:44 ` Jean Pihet
2011-08-16 17:45 ` mark gross
2011-08-16 18:01 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-08-11 15:06 ` [PATCH 06/15] PM QoS: implement the per-device PM QoS constraints jean.pihet
2011-08-13 3:16 ` mark gross
2011-08-13 21:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-08-14 8:50 ` Jean Pihet
2011-08-14 13:51 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-08-11 15:06 ` [PATCH 07/15] PM QoS: add a global notification mechanism for the device constraints jean.pihet
2011-08-14 21:50 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-08-16 9:58 ` Jean Pihet
2011-08-11 15:06 ` [PATCH 08/15] OMAP: convert I2C driver to PM QoS for latency constraints jean.pihet
2011-08-11 15:06 ` [PATCH 09/15] OMAP: PM: create a PM layer plugin for per-device constraints jean.pihet
2011-08-11 15:06 ` [PATCH 10/15] OMAP2+: powerdomain: control power domains next state jean.pihet
2011-08-11 15:06 ` [PATCH 11/15] OMAP3: powerdomain data: add wake-up latency figures jean.pihet
2011-08-11 15:06 ` [PATCH 12/15] OMAP4: " jean.pihet
2011-08-11 15:06 ` [PATCH 13/15] OMAP2+: omap_hwmod: manage the wake-up latency constraints jean.pihet
2011-08-11 15:06 ` [PATCH 14/15] OMAP: PM CONSTRAINTS: implement the devices " jean.pihet
2011-08-11 15:06 ` [PATCH 15/15] OMAP2+: cpuidle only influences the MPU state jean.pihet
2011-08-12 8:02 ` [PATCH v4 00/15] PM QoS: add a per-device latency constraints class Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-08-12 11:56 ` Jean Pihet
2011-08-12 21:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-08-14 8:51 ` Jean Pihet
2011-08-14 13:53 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2011-08-16 13:43 [PATCH v5 00/15] PM QoS: add a per-device latency constraints framework jean.pihet
2011-08-16 13:43 ` [PATCH 04/15] PM QoS: re-organize data structs jean.pihet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110813025629.GD639@gvim.org \
--to=markgross@thegnar.org \
--cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=j-pihet@ti.com \
--cc=jean.pihet@newoldbits.com \
--cc=khilman@ti.com \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
--cc=paul@pwsan.com \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=toddpoynor@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox