From: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
Linux PM mailing list <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Jean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com>,
markgross@thegnar.org
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 02/11] PM: extend PM QoS with per-device wake-up constraints
Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2011 18:04:03 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110820170403.GA27040@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201108201834.34741.rjw@sisk.pl>
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 06:34:34PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Saturday, August 20, 2011, Mark Brown wrote:
> > Any sort of media streaming would be an obvious example - the
> > application picks the amount of data it buffers and how often it's
> > notified of progress depending on the usage which then controls how
> > quickly the system needs to handle things.
> Well, what about other types of devices?
Other than the input case (which is a latency issue - there's two
components, one is how much data is delivered for things like
touchscreens which stream and the other is how quickly the first data is
delivered) nothing immediately springs to mind but this may just be a
product of what I'm most familiar with. I don't really see this as a
problem, for a lot of devices it's probably the case that the device can
figure out something sensible to do without any help.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-20 17:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-06-30 15:11 [PATCH v2 00/11] PM QoS: add a per-device wake-up latency constraint class jean.pihet
2011-06-30 15:11 ` [PATCH 01/11] PM: add a per-device wake-up latency constraints plist jean.pihet
2011-07-02 19:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-07-20 8:57 ` Jean Pihet
2011-06-30 15:11 ` [PATCH 02/11] PM: extend PM QoS with per-device wake-up constraints jean.pihet
2011-07-02 21:10 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-07-20 9:13 ` Jean Pihet
2011-08-02 17:49 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-08-02 20:19 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-08-02 21:23 ` Kevin Hilman
2011-08-02 22:16 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-08-04 13:24 ` [linux-pm] " Mark Brown
2011-08-04 19:15 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-08-05 15:29 ` mark gross
2011-08-05 16:11 ` Mark Brown
2011-08-05 19:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-08-06 3:37 ` Mark Brown
2011-08-06 19:46 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-08-07 2:47 ` [linux-pm] " Mark Brown
2011-08-08 21:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-08-19 3:11 ` Mark Brown
2011-08-19 20:42 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-08-19 23:14 ` Mark Brown
2011-08-20 2:24 ` Alan Stern
2011-08-20 6:25 ` Mark Brown
2011-08-20 13:48 ` Alan Stern
2011-08-20 15:30 ` Mark Brown
2011-08-20 16:34 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-08-20 17:04 ` Mark Brown [this message]
2011-08-20 19:14 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-08-21 8:25 ` Mark Brown
2011-08-21 18:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-08-23 9:21 ` Mark Brown
2011-08-23 21:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-08-25 10:38 ` Mark Brown
2011-08-25 14:17 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-08-25 14:41 ` Jean Pihet
2011-08-25 14:49 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-08-26 16:40 ` mark gross
2011-08-20 9:35 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-08-20 10:31 ` Mark Brown
2011-08-20 16:51 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-08-20 17:22 ` Mark Brown
2011-08-20 19:18 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-08-26 2:25 ` MyungJoo Ham
2011-08-26 16:54 ` mark gross
2011-08-26 20:56 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-06-30 15:11 ` [PATCH 03/11] PM QoS: support the dynamic devices insertion and removal jean.pihet
2011-07-02 21:14 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-07-20 9:16 ` Jean Pihet
2011-06-30 15:11 ` [PATCH 04/11] OMAP PM: create a PM layer plugin for per-device constraints jean.pihet
2011-06-30 15:11 ` [PATCH 05/11] OMAP PM: early init of the pwrdms states jean.pihet
2011-06-30 15:11 ` [PATCH 06/11] OMAP2+: powerdomain: control power domains next state jean.pihet
2011-06-30 15:11 ` [PATCH 07/11] OMAP3: powerdomain data: add wake-up latency figures jean.pihet
2011-06-30 15:11 ` [PATCH 08/11] OMAP4: " jean.pihet
2011-06-30 15:11 ` [PATCH 09/11] OMAP2+: omap_hwmod: manage the wake-up latency constraints jean.pihet
2011-06-30 15:11 ` [PATCH 10/11] OMAP: PM CONSTRAINTS: implement the devices " jean.pihet
2011-06-30 15:11 ` [PATCH 11/11] OMAP2+: cpuidle only influences the MPU state jean.pihet
2011-07-02 19:20 ` [PATCH v2 00/11] PM QoS: add a per-device wake-up latency constraint class Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-07-04 7:16 ` Vishwanath Sripathy
2011-07-04 8:38 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-07-20 9:26 ` Jean Pihet
2011-07-20 13:22 ` mark gross
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110820170403.GA27040@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--to=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=j-pihet@ti.com \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=markgross@thegnar.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).