From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH 02/11] PM: extend PM QoS with per-device
 wake-up constraints
Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2011 11:38:48 +0100
Message-ID: <20110825103847.GD31154@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
References: <20110820062543.GA5011@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
 <201108212005.53898.rjw@sisk.pl>
 <20110823092155.GJ9232@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
 <201108232331.54844.rjw@sisk.pl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from opensource.wolfsonmicro.com ([80.75.67.52]:38502 "EHLO
	opensource2.wolfsonmicro.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752414Ab1HYKiu (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 25 Aug 2011 06:38:50 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <201108232331.54844.rjw@sisk.pl>
Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>, Linux PM mailing list <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Jean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com>, markgross@thegnar.org

On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 11:31:54PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

> Perhaps.  Still, that requires some policy to be put into drivers,
> which I don't think is entirely correct.

So, I don't really have the bandwidth to discuss this properly for at
least the next week or so - is it possible to find some time in the
power track at LPC for this?