From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Subject: Re: How to handle named resources with DT?
Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 17:35:55 +0200
Message-ID: <201108261735.55412.arnd@arndb.de>
References: <20110809205723.GE11568@ponder.secretlab.ca>
	<201108261258.32880.arnd@arndb.de>
	<20110826130644.GN2308@yookeroo.fritz.box>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org>
In-Reply-To: <20110826130644.GN2308@yookeroo.fritz.box>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/options/linux-arm-kernel>,
	<mailto:linux-arm-kernel-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/>
List-Post: <mailto:linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linux-arm-kernel-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel>,
	<mailto:linux-arm-kernel-request@lists.infradead.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: linux-arm-kernel-bounces@lists.infradead.org
Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org
To: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>, Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>, Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>, "Cousson,
	Benoit" <b-cousson@ti.com>, "G, Manjunath Kondaiah" <manjugk@ti.com>, "devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org" <devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org>, Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>, Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>, Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>, linux-omap <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>, "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org

On Friday 26 August 2011, David Gibson wrote:
> If you open code it this way then yes, it's silly.  But what about
> something like this:
> 
> static struct of_device_id foodevice_of_match[] __devinitdata = {
>         { .compatible = "foocorp,foodevice1234",
>           .resource_names = {"base_regs", "extra_regs", }, },
>         { .compatible = "foocorp,foodevice1239",
>           .resource_names = {"base_regs", "extra_regs", "more_regs", }, }, 
>         { },
> };

Hmm, I hadn't thought of that. This looks quite nice indeed. No objections
to this from my side.

	Arnd