public inbox for linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Liam Girdwood <lrg@ti.com>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Paul Mundt <lethal@linux-sh.org>,
	Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
	Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>,
	linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
	uclinux-dist-devel@blackfin.uclinux.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: Provide dummy supply support
Date: Sat, 29 Oct 2011 00:47:57 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111028224757.GG23421@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111028215931.GA30366@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>

On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 11:59:31PM +0200, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 10:26:58PM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> 
> >  drivers/regulator/Makefile        |    2 +-
> >  drivers/regulator/dummy-supply.c  |   88 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 
> We already have a dummy regulator driver and a fixed voltage regulator
> driver, we shouldn't be adding a third implementation of the same thing.
> Just use the fixed voltage regulator for this.

I explained in my mail why I think that the current implementation of
the dummy regulator is not suitable for things apart from debugging.

My main concern with the fixed regulator is that it needs quite much
boilerplate code just to say that we have no regulator at all for a
given device. That could also be handled with a helper function which
registers a fixed regulator and only takes the regulator_consumer_supply
as an argument. Would that be ok for you?

Sascha

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

  reply	other threads:[~2011-10-28 22:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-10-28 20:26 [PATCH] regulator: provide dummy supply support Sascha Hauer
2011-10-28 20:26 ` [PATCH] regulator: Provide " Sascha Hauer
2011-10-28 21:59   ` Mark Brown
2011-10-28 22:47     ` Sascha Hauer [this message]
2011-10-28 23:16       ` Mike Frysinger
2011-10-29 17:42       ` Mark Brown
2011-11-01 17:50       ` Mike Frysinger
2011-11-01 18:27         ` Mark Brown
2011-11-02 10:03           ` Sascha Hauer
2011-11-02 10:41             ` Mark Brown
2011-11-02 14:29               ` Sascha Hauer
2011-10-28 21:57 ` [PATCH] regulator: provide " Mark Brown
2011-10-28 23:22   ` Mike Frysinger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20111028224757.GG23421@pengutronix.de \
    --to=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
    --cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lrg@ti.com \
    --cc=tony@atomide.com \
    --cc=uclinux-dist-devel@blackfin.uclinux.org \
    --cc=vapier@gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox