From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Olof Johansson Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] regulator: helper routine to extract regulator_init_data Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2011 14:22:16 -0700 Message-ID: <20111104212216.GA5756@quad.lixom.net> References: <1319721864-30067-1-git-send-email-rnayak@ti.com> <20111104202905.GA3918@quad.lixom.net> <20111104211447.GC2541@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20111104211447.GC2541@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-arm-kernel-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: Mark Brown Cc: patches@linaro.org, tony@atomide.com, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, Rajendra Nayak , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, grant.likely@secretlab.ca, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, lrg@ti.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 09:14:48PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 01:29:05PM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 06:54:24PM +0530, Rajendra Nayak wrote: > > > > @@ -0,0 +1,33 @@ > > > +Voltage/Current Regulators > > > There should be a mandatory compatible field here, right? I.e. a topmost > > generic one, "regulator" or similar. > > It's not really useful for the regulator subsystem to directly bind to > the device as something needs to actually control it, the idea is that > this binding is included by reference in the bindings for specific > devices. Right, same goes for many other devices. Some use a toplevel compatible field, some do not. Either way, not a big deal if you don't want to include one. > > Also, lower-caps is common instead of V and A. > > On the other hand the case is pretty important for SI units Yeah, true. The fixed regulators used microvolt instead, which could be a good way to do it. > > > +- -supply: phandle to the parent supply/regulator node > > > Having a fixed name here instead of a free form string would probably be a good > > idea? > > The name will be fixed by the individual device bindings, this is > specifying the general form of a supply property. Each device binding > will define the set of supplies that the device can use. Ah, ok. It shouldn't be a part of this binding then and instead be added to the bindings for the consumers. -Olof