From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tony Lindgren Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] ARM: OMAP: DSS hwmod/reset fixes for 3.2 Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2011 14:04:23 -0800 Message-ID: <20111114220423.GQ31337@atomide.com> References: <20111105003550.GM31337@atomide.com> <1320746911.1907.47.camel@deskari> <1320754489.1907.50.camel@deskari> <20111114204649.GL31337@atomide.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mho-03-ewr.mailhop.org ([204.13.248.66]:60042 "EHLO mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751723Ab1KNWE0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 14 Nov 2011 17:04:26 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Paul Walmsley Cc: Tomi Valkeinen , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org * Paul Walmsley [111114 13:05]: > On Mon, 14 Nov 2011, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > I suggest we only merge the ones with "fix" in the subject during the -rc > > cycle. The others add new features for the reset, so they should wait until > > v3.3 merge window. > > Most of the other patches in the branch discuss what they fix in the patch > descriptions, rather than the subject lines. Do you want the subject > lines rewritten to highlight this? Well we should only merge major bugs and regressions during the -rc cycle. It seems that at least "OMAP: HWMOD: Unify DSS resets for OMAPs" has high flame potential based on that? Maybe we should wait until the next merge window to start removing some of these workarounds? Tony