From: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@gmail.com>
Cc: Sebastian Reichel <sre@debian.org>,
Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@bitmer.com>,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
Subject: Re: It looks like snd-soc-rx51 only works as built-in, not as a module
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 21:27:07 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111229212707.GA9737@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMP44s2Vo0iPa6aq6PGy8YSEnEQuNVi1345BtLV9U8zng61uFA@mail.gmail.com>
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 11:25:50PM +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 8:37 PM, Mark Brown
> > On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 05:59:57PM +0200, Felipe Contreras wrote:
> >> It was not working for me, but it seems the problem was related to
> >> mdev/udev; snd_soc_tlv320aic3x has to be loaded before snd-soc-rx51.
> > That should not be required, the modules should be loadable in any
> > order.
> Are you sure? I recall having a similar discussion with Rusell King,
> and the conclusion is that certain modules are supposed to be loaded
> by udev at boot time, and it seems snd_soc_tlv320aic3x is one of them.
I'm absolutely positive. ASoC supports loading the modules in any
order. udev is supposed to load anything autoloadable at boot time,
including I2C devices, but that's orthogonal to the order in which
things actually get loaded - udev can randomly reorder things if it
feels like it.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-29 21:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-09 23:04 It looks like snd-soc-rx51 only works as built-in, not as a module Felipe Contreras
2011-12-10 8:27 ` Sebastian Reichel
2011-12-10 15:59 ` Felipe Contreras
2011-12-29 18:37 ` Mark Brown
2011-12-29 21:25 ` Felipe Contreras
2011-12-29 21:27 ` Mark Brown [this message]
2011-12-29 21:51 ` Felipe Contreras
2011-12-29 21:54 ` Mark Brown
2011-12-29 22:22 ` Måns Rullgård
2011-12-30 10:52 ` [alsa-devel] " Mark Brown
2011-12-30 11:15 ` Jarkko Nikula
2011-12-30 18:21 ` Måns Rullgård
2011-12-30 19:34 ` Måns Rullgård
2011-12-31 1:02 ` Mark Brown
2011-12-30 20:00 ` Felipe Contreras
2011-12-31 0:59 ` Mark Brown
2012-01-02 18:33 ` Felipe Contreras
2012-01-02 19:40 ` Mark Brown
2012-01-03 0:19 ` Måns Rullgård
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111229212707.GA9737@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--to=broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=felipe.contreras@gmail.com \
--cc=jarkko.nikula@bitmer.com \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sre@debian.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).