From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>,
t-kristo@ti.com,
linux-omap mailing list <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
Joe Woodward <jw@terrafix.co.uk>
Subject: Re: PM(?) problems on v3.3-rc1 on OMAP3
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2012 07:46:20 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120122074620.2715ce7f@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1327161427.1863.5.camel@lappy>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2160 bytes --]
On Sat, 21 Jan 2012 17:57:07 +0200 Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ti.com>
wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-01-21 at 00:47 -0700, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> > On Fri, 20 Jan 2012, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> >
> > > Third, when I load the DSS modules, I see only ON state increasing for
> > > dss_pwrdm, as it should be. However, I'm getting constant stream of sync
> > > losts from DSS, and the display doesn't basically work at all.
> > >
> > > I can see MPU pwrdm going into RET a lot, and if I do "while true; do
> > > echo foo; done", which I presume basically prevents RET for MPU, the
> > > display becomes stable.
> >
> > If this particular problem persists after you apply the patch set that I
> > sent earlier, it suggests that something in the DSS is sensitive to the
> > amount of time it takes the MPU to wake up and service an interrupt when
> > the MPU powerdomain is in a low-power state. Total guess, but perhaps
> > omap_dispc_irq_handler() is getting called after each frame and needs to
> > run within a certain bounded time when that happens?
>
> No. After the DSS has been configured and started (by the MPU), it runs
> by itself, reading the pixels from the memory displaying them on the
> screen. Only when the user wants to change the configs or the frame, the
> MPU does something. And interrupts are only needed to handle the
> changing of configs or frame data using VSYNCs as the interval. The user
> probably doesn't like it if the VSYNC irq is handled a few seconds
> later, but the DSS HW doesn't care, and functions normally.
>
> In this case something is affecting the DSS (clocks? powers?), or the
> memory, or the process of reading the pixels. I really don't see the MPU
> or IRQs affecting this problem, except indirectly.
Which clocks, exactly, are important?
I collected some clock.c tracing while dss was repeatedly complaining about
losing SYNC, and notice that omap_96m_fck was being enabled and disabled in
hardware.
omap_96m_fck is upstream for dss_96m_fck which provides the tv_dac_clk.
Could it be this clock turning on and off which causes the problem?
Thanks,
NeilBrown
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 828 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-21 20:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-20 10:33 PM(?) problems on v3.3-rc1 on OMAP3 Tomi Valkeinen
2012-01-20 10:49 ` Govindraj
2012-01-20 11:07 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-01-20 11:21 ` Govindraj
2012-01-20 12:32 ` Jean Pihet
2012-01-20 12:44 ` Govindraj
2012-01-21 7:39 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-01-21 7:38 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-01-20 11:56 ` Govindraj
2012-01-20 12:01 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-01-20 12:34 ` Jean Pihet
2012-01-20 12:40 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-01-20 13:36 ` Jean Pihet
2012-01-20 15:00 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-01-22 11:11 ` NeilBrown
2012-01-23 8:53 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-01-23 9:04 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-01-23 9:24 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-01-23 9:31 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-01-23 10:48 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-01-23 11:02 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-01-23 11:06 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-01-24 10:39 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-01-20 12:45 ` Govindraj
2012-01-20 12:47 ` Shubhrajyoti
2012-01-21 7:35 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-01-21 7:47 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-01-21 15:57 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-01-21 20:46 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2012-01-23 8:25 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-01-21 20:47 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-01-22 11:11 ` Valkeinen, Tomi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120122074620.2715ce7f@notabene.brown \
--to=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=jw@terrafix.co.uk \
--cc=khilman@ti.com \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@pwsan.com \
--cc=t-kristo@ti.com \
--cc=tomi.valkeinen@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).