linux-omap.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
Cc: Joe Woodward <jw@terrafix.co.uk>,
	khilman@ti.com, t-kristo@ti.com, govindraj.raja@ti.com,
	linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: OMAP HDQ: was Re: DSS2/PM on 3.2 broken?
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 18:51:52 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120201185152.08336b18@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1201271813260.13783@utopia.booyaka.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2076 bytes --]

On Fri, 27 Jan 2012 23:02:51 -0700 (MST) Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com> wrote:


> Since the HDQ module doesn't support the idle protocol, the target clock 
> FSM in the CM is what should determine whether the module is considered 
> idle or not.  And as long as the bit in the CM_FCLKEN register 
> corresponding to HDQ_FCLK is set, the FSM should consider the module as 
> active, and the clockdomain should not be allowed to go inactive.
> 
> I write "should."  Given that big caution at the bottom of section 20.4.5 
> "System Power Management and Wakeup", this appears to have not been 
> correctly implemented.

Can you help me understand why you say "should" there.
You seem to be implying that a down-stream clock gate should cause an
upstream clock to stay active, but that doesn't make sense to me given the
presence of the much richer SIDLE framework.  Also I cannot find it in the
TRM (though there a lots of words in there and I might have missed some).

Most modules use SIDLE to keep the upstream clock active.  HDQ doesn't have
that so it needs software over-rid to keep it active.

> 
> > It also mentions the AUTO_HDQ bit of PRCM.CM_AUTOIDLE1_CORE.  This had me
> > confused for a while, but I think it only affects the iclk.  
> 
> That's correct.
> 
> > I don't think the iclk is the problem.  It is the fclk that is 
> > disappearing because the clkdm that feeds it is being turned off.
> 
> Disabling AUTO_HDQ is probably a reasonable workaround.  It would prevent 
> the CORE_L4 clockdomain from going inactive, and that happens to be where 
> the functional clock originates from, also.
> 
> We have a partial facility to handle this type of bug in the existing 
> code.  Could you please try the patch enclosed at the bottom of this 
> E-mail and see if it helps?

Yes, that patch fixes my problem too - the HDQ keeps working.

(it's a bit smoke-and-mirrors though .. I want fclk to stay on, so let's make
sure iclk doesn't autoidle, because we *know* they have the same source :-)


Thanks,
NeilBrown


[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 828 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2012-02-01  7:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-01-09 12:46 DSS2/PM on 3.2 broken? Joe Woodward
2012-01-09 21:08 ` NeilBrown
2012-01-10  9:58   ` Joe Woodward
2012-01-11 13:43   ` Paul Walmsley
2012-01-11 14:22     ` Archit
2012-01-11 15:15       ` Joe Woodward
2012-01-11 15:52         ` Archit
2012-01-11 16:13           ` Joe Woodward
2012-01-11 16:54             ` Archit
2012-01-12  9:28         ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-01-12  9:30           ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-01-12  9:51           ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-01-11 22:59     ` NeilBrown
2012-01-13 10:05       ` Paul Walmsley
2012-01-13 11:20         ` NeilBrown
2012-01-13 11:31           ` Paul Walmsley
2012-01-13 23:09             ` NeilBrown
2012-01-13 23:35               ` Paul Walmsley
2012-01-17 21:24               ` NeilBrown
2012-01-22  0:07                 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-01-22 11:30                   ` NeilBrown
2012-01-24 10:37                   ` OMAP HDQ: was " NeilBrown
2012-01-26 14:19                     ` Paul Walmsley
2012-01-27 22:35                       ` NeilBrown
2012-01-27 22:58                         ` Paul Walmsley
2012-01-28  0:40                           ` NeilBrown
2012-01-28  6:02                             ` Paul Walmsley
2012-02-01  7:51                               ` NeilBrown [this message]
2012-02-01 18:36                                 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-01-18  7:13           ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-01-18 11:15             ` NeilBrown
2012-01-18 11:42               ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-01-18 20:30                 ` NeilBrown
2012-01-19 10:17                   ` Joe Woodward
2012-01-19 10:40                     ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-01-19 11:29                       ` Joe Woodward
2012-01-19 11:36                         ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-01-19 12:21                           ` Joe Woodward
2012-01-19 14:52                             ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-01-19 19:37                             ` Kevin Hilman
2012-01-19 21:05                               ` NeilBrown
2012-01-20  0:22                                 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-01-21 12:12                                   ` NeilBrown
2012-01-23 22:11                                     ` Kevin Hilman
2012-01-25  0:32                                       ` NeilBrown
2012-01-13 11:34         ` Govindraj
2012-01-13 13:23           ` Paul Walmsley
2012-01-13 19:21         ` Kevin Hilman
2012-01-13 22:37           ` Kevin Hilman
2012-01-13 23:06             ` Paul Walmsley
2012-01-13 23:34               ` Paul Walmsley
2012-01-14  1:17                 ` NeilBrown
2012-01-14  1:28                   ` Paul Walmsley
2012-01-13 23:39               ` Paul Walmsley
2012-01-13 11:19       ` Paul Walmsley
2012-01-11 13:32 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-01-12 16:42 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-01-12 22:40   ` Kevin Hilman
2012-01-13  5:29     ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-01-13 19:30       ` Kevin Hilman
2012-01-16 11:11         ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-01-19 19:24           ` Kevin Hilman
2012-01-20  7:16             ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-01-20 18:06               ` Kevin Hilman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120201185152.08336b18@notabene.brown \
    --to=neilb@suse.de \
    --cc=govindraj.raja@ti.com \
    --cc=jw@terrafix.co.uk \
    --cc=khilman@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul@pwsan.com \
    --cc=t-kristo@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).