From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
Cc: Joe Woodward <jw@terrafix.co.uk>,
khilman@ti.com, t-kristo@ti.com, govindraj.raja@ti.com,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: OMAP HDQ: was Re: DSS2/PM on 3.2 broken?
Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 18:51:52 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120201185152.08336b18@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1201271813260.13783@utopia.booyaka.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2076 bytes --]
On Fri, 27 Jan 2012 23:02:51 -0700 (MST) Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com> wrote:
> Since the HDQ module doesn't support the idle protocol, the target clock
> FSM in the CM is what should determine whether the module is considered
> idle or not. And as long as the bit in the CM_FCLKEN register
> corresponding to HDQ_FCLK is set, the FSM should consider the module as
> active, and the clockdomain should not be allowed to go inactive.
>
> I write "should." Given that big caution at the bottom of section 20.4.5
> "System Power Management and Wakeup", this appears to have not been
> correctly implemented.
Can you help me understand why you say "should" there.
You seem to be implying that a down-stream clock gate should cause an
upstream clock to stay active, but that doesn't make sense to me given the
presence of the much richer SIDLE framework. Also I cannot find it in the
TRM (though there a lots of words in there and I might have missed some).
Most modules use SIDLE to keep the upstream clock active. HDQ doesn't have
that so it needs software over-rid to keep it active.
>
> > It also mentions the AUTO_HDQ bit of PRCM.CM_AUTOIDLE1_CORE. This had me
> > confused for a while, but I think it only affects the iclk.
>
> That's correct.
>
> > I don't think the iclk is the problem. It is the fclk that is
> > disappearing because the clkdm that feeds it is being turned off.
>
> Disabling AUTO_HDQ is probably a reasonable workaround. It would prevent
> the CORE_L4 clockdomain from going inactive, and that happens to be where
> the functional clock originates from, also.
>
> We have a partial facility to handle this type of bug in the existing
> code. Could you please try the patch enclosed at the bottom of this
> E-mail and see if it helps?
Yes, that patch fixes my problem too - the HDQ keeps working.
(it's a bit smoke-and-mirrors though .. I want fclk to stay on, so let's make
sure iclk doesn't autoidle, because we *know* they have the same source :-)
Thanks,
NeilBrown
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 828 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-01 7:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-09 12:46 DSS2/PM on 3.2 broken? Joe Woodward
2012-01-09 21:08 ` NeilBrown
2012-01-10 9:58 ` Joe Woodward
2012-01-11 13:43 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-01-11 14:22 ` Archit
2012-01-11 15:15 ` Joe Woodward
2012-01-11 15:52 ` Archit
2012-01-11 16:13 ` Joe Woodward
2012-01-11 16:54 ` Archit
2012-01-12 9:28 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-01-12 9:30 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-01-12 9:51 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-01-11 22:59 ` NeilBrown
2012-01-13 10:05 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-01-13 11:20 ` NeilBrown
2012-01-13 11:31 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-01-13 23:09 ` NeilBrown
2012-01-13 23:35 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-01-17 21:24 ` NeilBrown
2012-01-22 0:07 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-01-22 11:30 ` NeilBrown
2012-01-24 10:37 ` OMAP HDQ: was " NeilBrown
2012-01-26 14:19 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-01-27 22:35 ` NeilBrown
2012-01-27 22:58 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-01-28 0:40 ` NeilBrown
2012-01-28 6:02 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-02-01 7:51 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2012-02-01 18:36 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-01-18 7:13 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-01-18 11:15 ` NeilBrown
2012-01-18 11:42 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-01-18 20:30 ` NeilBrown
2012-01-19 10:17 ` Joe Woodward
2012-01-19 10:40 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-01-19 11:29 ` Joe Woodward
2012-01-19 11:36 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-01-19 12:21 ` Joe Woodward
2012-01-19 14:52 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-01-19 19:37 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-01-19 21:05 ` NeilBrown
2012-01-20 0:22 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-01-21 12:12 ` NeilBrown
2012-01-23 22:11 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-01-25 0:32 ` NeilBrown
2012-01-13 11:34 ` Govindraj
2012-01-13 13:23 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-01-13 19:21 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-01-13 22:37 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-01-13 23:06 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-01-13 23:34 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-01-14 1:17 ` NeilBrown
2012-01-14 1:28 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-01-13 23:39 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-01-13 11:19 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-01-11 13:32 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-01-12 16:42 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-01-12 22:40 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-01-13 5:29 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-01-13 19:30 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-01-16 11:11 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-01-19 19:24 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-01-20 7:16 ` Tomi Valkeinen
2012-01-20 18:06 ` Kevin Hilman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120201185152.08336b18@notabene.brown \
--to=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=govindraj.raja@ti.com \
--cc=jw@terrafix.co.uk \
--cc=khilman@ti.com \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@pwsan.com \
--cc=t-kristo@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).