From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/16] ARM: omap: fix vc.c PMIC error message
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 17:59:37 +0000
Message-ID: <20120209175937.GC19159@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
References: <87ty312ae0.fsf@ti.com> <20120208235358.GD16877@atomide.com> <20120208235620.GE25414@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <87sjikx3xv.fsf@ti.com> <20120209001135.GF25414@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <87ipjgx3g3.fsf@ti.com> <20120209004027.GF16877@atomide.com> <20120209164913.GB19159@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20120209171830.GH16877@atomide.com> <20120209172747.GG1426@atomide.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]:50700 "EHLO
	caramon.arm.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1757566Ab2BIR7u (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>); Thu, 9 Feb 2012 12:59:50 -0500
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20120209172747.GG1426@atomide.com>
Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
To: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org

On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 09:27:47AM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> [120209 08:47]:
> > 
> > So that leaves me only the second one to queue that adds checks
> > for the PMIC info for boards that don't have it, see below.
> ...
>  
> > From d269914ece0498f31603ecd85ed3d7a586b3cbcd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
> > Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 11:24:04 -0700
> > Subject: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: PM: only register TWL with voltage layer when device is present
> > 
> > Current code registers voltage layer details for TWL PMIC even when a TWL
> > has not been registered.  Fix this to only register the TWL with voltage
> > layer when the TWL PMIC is initialized by board-level code.
> > 
> > Tested-by: Abhilash Koyamangalath <abhilash.kv@ti.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
> 
> Never mind. This one is already in mainline as commit
> 46232a3622c6e33605906ee6690dfef372925f53.

Okay, I'll re-send patches 1 and 5 for acks then.  Once I have those,
can I assume that everyone is happy for patches 1 to 15 to go upstream?