From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tony Lindgren Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/16] ARM: omap: fix vc.c PMIC error message Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 10:06:34 -0800 Message-ID: <20120209180634.GI1426@atomide.com> References: <20120208235358.GD16877@atomide.com> <20120208235620.GE25414@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <87sjikx3xv.fsf@ti.com> <20120209001135.GF25414@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <87ipjgx3g3.fsf@ti.com> <20120209004027.GF16877@atomide.com> <20120209164913.GB19159@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20120209171830.GH16877@atomide.com> <20120209172747.GG1426@atomide.com> <20120209175937.GC19159@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org ([204.13.248.71]:63028 "EHLO mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757894Ab2BISGk (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Feb 2012 13:06:40 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120209175937.GC19159@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Russell King - ARM Linux Cc: Kevin Hilman , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org * Russell King - ARM Linux [120209 09:28]: > On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 09:27:47AM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > * Tony Lindgren [120209 08:47]: > > > > > > So that leaves me only the second one to queue that adds checks > > > for the PMIC info for boards that don't have it, see below. > > ... > > > > > From d269914ece0498f31603ecd85ed3d7a586b3cbcd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > > From: Kevin Hilman > > > Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 11:24:04 -0700 > > > Subject: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: PM: only register TWL with voltage layer when device is present > > > > > > Current code registers voltage layer details for TWL PMIC even when a TWL > > > has not been registered. Fix this to only register the TWL with voltage > > > layer when the TWL PMIC is initialized by board-level code. > > > > > > Tested-by: Abhilash Koyamangalath > > > Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman > > > > Never mind. This one is already in mainline as commit > > 46232a3622c6e33605906ee6690dfef372925f53. > > Okay, I'll re-send patches 1 and 5 for acks then. Once I have those, > can I assume that everyone is happy for patches 1 to 15 to go upstream? Yes as long as Kevin is happy with them. After you repost those two patches, I'll update linux-omap with your fixes + tty fixes + my fixes for people to test with. Regards, Tony