From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tony Lindgren Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: OMAP2+: Mark omap_hsmmc_init and omap_mux related functions as __init Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 08:41:07 -0800 Message-ID: <20120216164106.GC15692@atomide.com> References: <20120215182355.18884.18682.stgit@kaulin.local> <20120215182829.18884.69168.stgit@kaulin.local> <20120216101123.GI15338@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org ([204.13.248.72]:49591 "EHLO mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750914Ab2BPQlN (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Feb 2012 11:41:13 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120216101123.GI15338@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Russell King - ARM Linux Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org * Russell King - ARM Linux [120216 01:40]: > On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 10:28:30AM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > Now that omap hsmmc init is split into two functions, it's safe > > to mark omap_hsmmc_init and omap_mux related functions to __init. > > > > This basically reverts the following fixes for the case where > > TWL was compiled as a module: > > > > d5de63 (ARM: omap: preemptively fix section mismatch in omap4_sdp4430_wifi_mux_init()) > > Why did you include this one? This is unrelated to the TWL problems. Oops sorry, thanks for noticing. Your patch makes it __init, I was reading the patch wrong way around. Your patch should stay and my patch now changes it the wrong way. Regards, Tony