From: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@ti.com>,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Subject: Re: OMAP totally fucked?
Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2012 11:07:59 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120305190759.GJ12083@atomide.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120304155909.GA14466@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
* Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> [120304 07:27]:
> On Sat, Mar 03, 2012 at 01:05:21PM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> [120303 09:57]:
> > > On Saturday 03 March 2012, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > > > Well 85631d2 builds fine, looks like now some more includes of
> > > > plat/hardware.h are now needed.Have not yet tracked down which
> > > > commit triggers the build errors. Eventually those should become
> > > > local headers too..
> > >
> > > I've tried building arm-soc/for-next and rmk/for-next, they are both
> > > fine, just merging the two gives me the same build errors that Russell
> > > saw.
> > >
> > > Adding plat/hardware.h in all files that break solves the problems,
> > > aside from the iommu dependency for rpmsg for which Ohad has provided
> > > a fix already that I should pull.
> >
> > Here's a patch for you to the cleanup branch to fix the hardware.h
> > build errors.
>
> Right, with this applied, things are better:
>
> 1. omap3430ldp allnoconfig is the first build without warnings, congrats.
> 2. omap4430sdp allnoconfig has a bunch of new section mismatch warnings,
> a couple of compiler warnings, and builds:
>
> WARNING: arch/arm/mach-omap2/built-in.o(.text+0x183c): Section mismatch in reference from the function omap2_init_processor_devices() to the function .init.text:_init_omap_device()
> The function omap2_init_processor_devices() references
> the function __init _init_omap_device().
> This is often because omap2_init_processor_devices lacks a __init
> annotation or the annotation of _init_omap_device is wrong.
>
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/io.c:51: warning: 'omap24xx_io_desc' defined but not used
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-wakeupgen.c:181: warning: 'wakeupgen_irqmask_all' defined but not used
>
> 3. omap4430sdp randconfig built with these omap specific warnings (exluding
> ones already mentioned):
>
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-n8x0.c:39: warning: 'slot1_cover_open' defined but not used
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-n8x0.c:40: warning: 'slot2_cover_open' defined but not used
> arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-n8x0.c:41: warning: 'mmc_device' defined but not used
I'll do some patches to fix these warnings.
> and, of course, this is with these configs building OMAP2..OMAP4 because of
> the config.
That should get fixed soon too with revert.
Regards,
Tony
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-05 19:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-03 15:46 OMAP totally fucked? Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-03-03 18:04 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-03-03 18:29 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-03-03 21:05 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-03-04 15:59 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-03-05 19:07 ` Tony Lindgren [this message]
2012-03-06 19:45 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-03-06 19:55 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-03-06 20:15 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-03-06 21:23 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-03-03 18:32 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-03-03 19:01 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-03-03 19:28 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-03-03 20:01 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-03-03 20:28 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-03-03 20:34 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-03-03 20:52 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-03-03 21:21 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-03-03 21:57 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-03-06 14:58 ` Cousson, Benoit
2012-03-06 15:08 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-03-06 15:41 ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-03-06 15:29 ` Peter Ujfalusi
2012-03-06 20:14 ` Tony Lindgren
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120305190759.GJ12083@atomide.com \
--to=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=olof@lixom.net \
--cc=peter.ujfalusi@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).