linux-omap.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com>,
	linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Olof Johansson <olof@lixom.net>
Subject: Re: Latest OMAP4 build errors
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2012 10:06:15 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120307100615.GA17404@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201203061701.54141.arnd@arndb.de>

On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 05:01:53PM +0000, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 06 March 2012, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 12:11:37PM +0200, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 12:01 PM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> > > > I think 'depends' would be better here, because selecting IOMMU_SUPPORT
> > > > has other side-effects that a user might not want. It's just as likely
> > > > that someone wants to disable IOMMU_SUPPORT and needs to find OMAP_REMOTEPROC
> > > > as wanting to enable OMAP_REMOTEPROC and having to find IOMMU_SUPPORT.
> > > >
> > > > In most cases, the defconfig should just set both.
> > > 
> > > Ok, 'depends on' it is.
> > 
> > We're a week on, which means I now have a full set of 7 builds on the
> > website for OMAP4430 all of which have failed in part due to this
> > as yet unresolved problem.
> > 
> > What's happening to get it fixed and those fixes into whatever tree is
> > necessary for them (presumably arm-soc)?
> 
> Ohad has sent a series of patches for review and there were no comments
> on those. The fix was part of it as far as I remember. I'm still waiting
> for a pull request from Ohad.

Given that we're coming to the end of what could be the _final_ week
before the merge window opens, this is not good news.  Read: maybe
three days before final.

The fact is that OMAP is - yet again - in a totally rotten state in terms
of what's queued up in the armsoc tree.  It is - yet again - completely
unbuildable for many configurations.  Just go and have a look at:

	http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/developer/build/

to see what an utterly crappy state OMAP is in again.  Last nights build
was my tree plus latest arm-soc.  Some of those issues have patches (I
had been applying one patch manually to the build tree) but that's not
the point - they're not in arm-soc, so the OMAP code in arm-soc is not
yet ready for mainline.

So, as OMAP is soo broken, and as promised after the last merge window -
I don't want any OMAP stuff going upstream from armsoc until we get error
free builds from the allno and old configs on the builder.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-03-07 10:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-02-28  9:02 Latest OMAP4 build errors Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-02-28  9:51 ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2012-02-28 10:01   ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-02-28 10:11     ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2012-03-06 16:55       ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-03-06 17:01         ` Arnd Bergmann
2012-03-06 17:06           ` Ohad Ben-Cohen
2012-03-07 10:06           ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2012-03-07 17:10             ` Tony Lindgren
2012-03-07 22:18               ` Olof Johansson
2012-03-07 22:44                 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-03-07 23:43                   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-03-08  3:34                     ` Tony Lindgren

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120307100615.GA17404@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
    --to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ohad@wizery.com \
    --cc=olof@lixom.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).