From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: rtc-linux@googlegroups.com
Cc: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>,
Konstantin Shlyakhovoy <x0155534@ti.com>,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>,
Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com>,
linux-omap <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [rtc-linux] [PATCH] RTC: twl6030: correct usage of static register while reading time
Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2012 12:19:34 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120406121934.0d6d3ffc.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1332970441-3495-1-git-send-email-nm@ti.com>
On Wed, 28 Mar 2012 16:34:01 -0500
Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com> wrote:
> From: Konstantin Shlyakhovoy <x0155534@ti.com>
>
> RTC stores time and date in several registers. Due to the fact that
> these registers can't be read instantaneously, there is a chance
> that reading from counting registers gives an error of one minute,
> one hour, one day, etc.
>
> To address this issue, the RTC has hardware support to copy the
> RTC counting registers to static shadowed registers.
> The current implementation does not use this feature, and in a
> stress test, we can reproduce this error at a rate of around
> two times per 300000 readings.
>
> Fix the implementation to ensure that the right snapshot of time
> is captured.
hey, nice changelog!
Please cc me on rtc patches - I tend to be a bit slow reading the
rtc-linux list.
> Cc: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>
> Cc: Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com>
> Cc: linux-omap <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>
> Acked-by: Mykola Oleksiienko <x0174904@ti.com>
> Acked-by: Oleksandr Dmytryshyn <oleksandr.dmytryshyn@ti.com>
> Acked-by: Graeme Gregory <gg@slimlogic.co.uk>
> Acked-by: Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>
> Signed-off-by: Konstantin Shlyakhovoy <x0155534@ti.com>
I rewrote your acked-by to Signed-off-by, because you were on the
delivery path of the patch. Documentation/SubmittingPatches has details.
Is this OK?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-06 19:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-28 21:34 [PATCH] RTC: twl6030: correct usage of static register while reading time Nishanth Menon
2012-04-06 19:19 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2012-04-07 15:59 ` [rtc-linux] " Menon, Nishanth
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120406121934.0d6d3ffc.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=a.zummo@towertech.it \
--cc=b-cousson@ti.com \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nm@ti.com \
--cc=rtc-linux@googlegroups.com \
--cc=x0155534@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox