public inbox for linux-omap@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Mark A. Greer" <mgreer@animalcreek.com>
To: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
Cc: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	khilman@ti.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/12] arm: omap3: Only sleep in cpuidle driver if I/O wake-ups work
Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2012 15:23:13 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120411222313.GC31197@animalcreek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1204111532280.29473@utopia.booyaka.com>

On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 03:37:47PM -0600, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 11 Apr 2012, Mark A. Greer wrote:
> 
> > From: "Mark A. Greer" <mgreer@animalcreek.com>
> > 
> > Currently, the OMAP3 cpuidle driver calls omap3_enter_idle()
> > which calls omap_sram_idle().  omap_sram_idle() eventually
> > causes a 'wfi' instruction to be executed effectively putting
> > the system to sleep.  It is assumed that an I/O wake-up event
> > will occur to wake the system up again.  This doesn't work on
> > systems that don't support I/O wake-ups (indicated by
> > omap3_has_io_wakeup() returning false).
> > 
> > To handle this, follow the same path in omap3_enter_idle()
> > that would be followed if an interrupt were pending.
> 
> I don't quite understand this patch.  Are you saying that AM3517/3505 
> can't wake from WFI?  That would seem odd.

No, I'm saying that I/O doesn't seem to wake it up from the WFI.
I've learned to not trust the am35x TRM much so I'm pretty much
feeling my way along in the dark.  I do know that without this
patch, the system is extremely slow which I believe is from it
only returning from the WFI because of a timer expiration or
something like that.

> There are other sources of wakeup on the system other than I/O wakeup.  
> I/O wakeup only applies to wakeups from the I/O pads when the chip is in 
> RETENTION or OFF.  And as I understand it, neither of those apply to 
> AM3517/3505?

Hmm, its true that RETENTION and OFF aren't supported.  It does wake up
occasionally (as mentioned above) it just seems that I/O doesn't wake
it up.  I may be mistaken.  I'm only going from what I've seen since and
the TRM seems to have lots of errors so I'm not sure what to trust in it.

> Even if I/O wakeups aren't supported, many of the IP blocks on the system 
> should be able to cause the ARM to exit WFI by asserting their 
> SWAKEUP lines and raising their interrupt lines.

Okay, but that doesn't seem to be working.  I'll look some more to see
why they aren't working.

> So this change doesn't seem quite right to me...
> 
> More broadly, if AM3517/3505 only supports powerdomains ON, then you 
> should probably use your own CPUIdle driver that doesn't touch the 
> powerdomain states at all.

Okay, I can do that.

Mark
--

  reply	other threads:[~2012-04-11 22:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-04-11 19:05 arm: omap3: am35x: Powerdomain, EMIF4, etc. fixups Mark A. Greer
2012-04-11 19:05 ` [PATCH 01/12] arm: omap3: Only access IVA if one exists Mark A. Greer
2012-04-11 19:05 ` [PATCH 02/12] arm: omap3: Only sleep during cpu_idle if I/O wake-ups work Mark A. Greer
2012-04-11 21:38   ` Paul Walmsley
2012-04-11 23:42   ` Jon Hunter
2012-04-13  0:13     ` Mark A. Greer
2012-04-11 19:05 ` [PATCH 03/12] arm: omap3: Only sleep in cpuidle driver " Mark A. Greer
2012-04-11 21:37   ` Paul Walmsley
2012-04-11 22:23     ` Mark A. Greer [this message]
2012-04-11 22:47       ` Paul Walmsley
2012-04-11 23:08         ` Mark A. Greer
2012-04-24 20:51     ` Mark A. Greer
2012-04-24 23:25       ` Mark A. Greer
2012-04-27 21:12         ` Kevin Hilman
2012-04-27 21:55           ` Mark A. Greer
2012-04-30 21:34           ` Mark A. Greer
2012-04-30 22:00             ` Kevin Hilman
2012-04-30 22:18               ` Mark A. Greer
2012-04-11 19:05 ` [PATCH 04/12] arm: omap3: am35x: Don't mark missing features as present Mark A. Greer
2012-04-11 19:05 ` [PATCH 05/12] arm: omap3: am35x: Add PWROFF feature Mark A. Greer
2012-04-11 22:46   ` Kevin Hilman
2012-04-11 23:11     ` Mark A. Greer
2012-04-24  4:36     ` Mark A. Greer
2012-04-27 21:07       ` Kevin Hilman
2012-04-30 22:08         ` Mark A. Greer
2012-04-11 19:05 ` [PATCH 06/12] arm: omap3: am35x: Add full PWRDM_POWER_INACTIVE support Mark A. Greer
2012-04-11 20:56   ` Jean Pihet
2012-04-11 21:08     ` Paul Walmsley
2012-04-11 21:14       ` Mark A. Greer
2012-04-11 21:15         ` Jean Pihet
2012-04-11 21:12     ` Mark A. Greer
2012-04-11 22:17   ` Paul Walmsley
2012-04-11 19:05 ` [PATCH 07/12] arm: omap3: am35x: Set proper powerdomain states Mark A. Greer
2012-04-11 21:53   ` Paul Walmsley
2012-04-11 22:40     ` Mark A. Greer
2012-04-12  0:24       ` Jon Hunter
2012-04-12  2:19         ` Mark A. Greer
2012-04-11 19:05 ` [PATCH 08/12] arm: omap3: am35x: Fix clockdomain dependencies Mark A. Greer
2012-04-11 21:44   ` Paul Walmsley
2012-04-11 21:55     ` Mark A. Greer
2012-04-11 22:04       ` Paul Walmsley
2012-04-11 22:49         ` Mark A. Greer
2012-04-11 23:49           ` Paul Walmsley
2012-04-12  2:23             ` Mark A. Greer
2012-04-12  2:29               ` Paul Walmsley
2012-04-12 23:00                 ` Mark A. Greer
2012-04-11 19:05 ` [PATCH 09/12] arm: omap3: am35x: Add SDRC EMIF4 feature Mark A. Greer
2012-04-11 21:29   ` Paul Walmsley
2012-04-11 22:50     ` Mark A. Greer
2012-04-11 22:56   ` Paul Walmsley
2012-04-11 23:23     ` Mark A. Greer
2012-04-11 19:05 ` [PATCH 10/12] arm: omap3: am35x: Add minimal EMIF4 support Mark A. Greer
2012-04-11 21:31   ` Paul Walmsley
2012-04-11 23:22     ` Mark A. Greer
2012-04-11 19:05 ` [PATCH 11/12] arm: omap3: am35x: Add do_wfi routine for EMIF4 submodules Mark A. Greer
2012-04-11 22:35   ` Kevin Hilman
2012-04-11 23:26     ` Mark A. Greer
2012-04-11 22:36   ` Paul Walmsley
2012-04-13  0:12     ` Mark A. Greer
2012-04-11 22:54   ` Paul Walmsley
2012-04-11 19:05 ` [PATCH 12/12] arm: omap3: am35x: Register davinci_mdio before davinci_emac Mark A. Greer
2012-04-11 21:24   ` Paul Walmsley
2012-04-11 22:00     ` Mark A. Greer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120411222313.GC31197@animalcreek.com \
    --to=mgreer@animalcreek.com \
    --cc=khilman@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul@pwsan.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox