From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tony Lindgren Subject: Re: HSI: any status updates on omap_ssi? Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 08:23:16 -0700 Message-ID: <20120424152316.GH3739@atomide.com> References: <20120421105235.GA3296@earth.universe> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org ([204.13.248.72]:56169 "EHLO mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755598Ab2DXPXX (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 Apr 2012 11:23:23 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120421105235.GA3296@earth.universe> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Sebastian Reichel Cc: Carlos Chinea , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org * Sebastian Reichel [120421 04:26]: > Hi, > > Missing omap_ssi support is currently the most important missing > feature, to make the mainline kernel on the Nokia N900 useful, see > also [0]. > > Can you prepare SSI inclusion into the mainline kernel, now that HSI > has been pulled into 3.4? Do you think we get SSI support in 3.5? Also FYI related to n900, you need to have bce492c0 (ARM: OMAP2+: UART: Fix incorrect population of default uart pads) applied after v3.1 if using CONFIG_OMAP_MUX to avoid some SSI pins getting wronly muxed to UART. Then to verify, the hw floating point error you reported a while back with omap2plus_defconfig got resolved, right? Regards, Tony > [0] http://elinux.org/N900