From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Russell King - ARM Linux Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] dmaengine: amba-pl08x: ensure physical channels are properly held Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2012 22:41:28 +0100 Message-ID: <20120427214128.GH28062@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20120418100954.GK25053@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20120418101938.GM25053@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]:39749 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752849Ab2D0Vln (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Apr 2012 17:41:43 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Linus Walleij Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, Vinod Koul , Dan Williams On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 10:38:08PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 12:19 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux > wrote: > > > Oops, this patch wasn't supposed to be part of this set... > > ...however it gives me the impression that you have a patch set cooking > to also switch PL08x over to the virtual channel mechanism which is > really appetizing to see :-) Actually, that doesn't exist yet. This was a patch I'd had floating around, but I don't think its needed in any way - I mis-analysed the code and created the patch...