Re: [PATCH 00/13] ARM: OMAP5: Add minimal OMAP5 SOC support

[Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>]

* Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> [120508 00:27]:
> On Tuesday 08 May 2012 03:56 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> [120507 02:53]:
> >> Tony,
> >>
> >> On Thursday 03 May 2012 12:56 PM, R Sricharan wrote:
> >>> The series adds minimal OMAP5 support.
> >>> OMAP5430 has a dual core Cortex-A15 based MPU subsystem with 2MB
> >>> L2 cache. The SOC has many compatible blocks with OMAP4 SOCS and
> >>> hence large part of the peripherals are re-used.
> >>>
> >>> OMAP5432 is another variant of OMAP5430, with a
> >>> memory controller supporting DDR3 and SATA.
> >>>
> >>> Series is generated against the 3.4-rc5. This has been rebased on
> >>> top of the OMAP2+ cleanup series [1]
> >>>
> >>> To get the boot working with omap2plus_defconfig,
> >>> OMAP5 hwmod/clock/prm/cm database needs to be added.
> >>> The data and the integrated tree are available in the
> >>> below git repository
> >>>
> >>> OMAP5_DATA:
> >>> git://gitorious.org/omap-sw-develoment/linux-omap-dev.git
> >>>  omap5_data
> >>>
> >>> OMAP5_INTEGRATED:
> >>> git://gitorious.org/omap-sw-develoment/linux-omap-dev.git
> >>>  omap5_dt_integrated
> >>>
> >>> The series is boot tested on OMAP5430 ES1.0.
> >>> OMAP2/3/4 build and boot is tested as well to avoid any breakage
> >>> because of the series.
> >>>
> >>> Patch "TEMP: ARM: OMAP5: Add cpu_is_omap54xx() checks" is temporary and
> >>> can be dropped once rebased against [2]
> >>>
> >>> Patch "TEMP: ARM: OMAP5: Update the base address of the 32k-counter" is
> >>> temporary and can be dropped once rebased against [3]
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-omap/msg69233.html
> >>> [2] http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-omap/msg69013.html
> >>> [3] http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-omap@vger.kernel.org/msg67166.html
> >>>
> >> Do you have a branch where above dependencies are merged ?
> > 
> > Seems like those should go into the cleanup branch, and then
> > that can be used as a base.
> >
> Yep. That will be a good base.
> 
> >> How do you suggest to go about updating this series so
> >> that above dependencies plus DT support(3.3 based branch
> >> in arm-soc tree and needs to be updated against 3.4) is
> >> base tree for the patchset.
> > 
> > Probably the DT patch should be separate, we can make dt branch
> > depend on the cleanup branch.
> > 
> Sounds good. Btw, who is re-basing the omap-dt branch against 3.4 ?

That's already queued up, I can merge in some trivial v3.4 based patches
Benoit has and it gets updated automatically.
 
> > Then the data files should be first posted for reviews (and potentially
> > updated for what we have queued in hwmod-cleanup).  Does this series
> > compile on it's own without the data now?
> > 
> This series does compile on it's own without data patches. Data
> patches needs to re-based against Paul's clean-up and also we
> need to sort out ES1/ES2 diff so they can wait till then.
> Probably 3.6+

OK good.
 
> This series was intentionally made in such a way that it can
> be merged without data patches. Just for getting boot working
> on OMAP5 data patches needs to be merged.

Great, excellent.

Regards,

Tony