Re: Panda: USB crash with today's linux-next

[Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1195 bytes --]

Hi,

On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 03:29:21PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 03:24:11PM +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> > On Mon, 2012-05-14 at 15:15 +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > 
> > > looks like MUSB is probing before transceiver driver... could it be ?
> > > Can you check transceiver has actually probed ? I guess panda's using
> > > twl6030-usb.c
> > 
> > Ah. Perhaps it's then about this?
> > 
> > [    0.352905] Skipping twl internal clock init and using bootloader value (unknown osc rate)
> > [    0.354034] twl 1-0048: PIH (irq 39) chaining IRQs 352..372
> > [    0.356079] VUSB: 3300 mV normal standby
> > [    0.358123] genirq: Threaded irq requested with handler=NULL and !ONESHOT for irq 356
> > [    0.358215] twl6030_usb twl6030_usb: can't get IRQ 356, err -22
> > [    0.358398] twl6030_usb: probe of twl6030_usb failed with error -22
> 
> sounds about right. Now, why can't it get the IRQ... Benoit, is this
> related to your sparse irq/irq_domain changes ?

Looks like twl6030-irq still missed conversion to threaded IRQ. It still
has that ugly ass kthread to handle the IRQs. Oh well, yet another
broken OMAP driver...

-- 
balbi

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]