From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Brown Subject: Re: RFC: changing DMA slave configuration API Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 13:36:07 -0700 Message-ID: <20120611203607.GA16899@codeaurora.org> References: <20120610102023.GC11404@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20120610112217.GD11404@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <1339390249.1927.1623.camel@vkoul-udesk3> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from wolverine02.qualcomm.com ([199.106.114.251]:62930 "EHLO wolverine02.qualcomm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751285Ab2FKUgR (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Jun 2012 16:36:17 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1339390249.1927.1623.camel@vkoul-udesk3> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Vinod Koul Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux , Dan Williams , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com>, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 10:20:49AM +0530, Vinod Koul wrote: > I think it is a good idea. And I would like to extend it even a little > bit. Do we have any users of peripheral to peripheral slave dma? > IIRC that is not the case, or does anyone know of existence or plans > for such a h/w? We have hardware that supports this, and I suspect it will become more common in our future chips. David -- Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.