From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tony Lindgren Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 04/14] ARM: OMAP2+: gpmc: minimal driver support Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 05:07:17 -0700 Message-ID: <20120613120717.GP12766@atomide.com> References: <54e643eb1b4dbefcbb52580fa582043bf4f0da3d.1339419492.git.afzal@ti.com> <4FD6586A.9060706@ti.com> <4FD782F7.9010003@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org ([204.13.248.71]:35572 "EHLO mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753586Ab2FMMHT (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jun 2012 08:07:19 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4FD782F7.9010003@ti.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Jon Hunter Cc: "Mohammed, Afzal" , "paul@pwsan.com" , "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" * Jon Hunter [120612 11:01]: > > On 06/12/2012 02:16 AM, Mohammed, Afzal wrote: > > Hi Jon, > > > > On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 02:13:22, Hunter, Jon wrote: > > > >>> + gpmc_revision = (l >> 4) & 0xf; > >> > >> Why are you only storing the major part of the rev? Why not keep both parts? > > > > Does having minor revision add any value ?, at least as of now, > > I do not see any. > > May be not but it does not hurt either. Yeah might as well show the full revision. Tony