From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tony Lindgren Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: OMAP2+: gpmc: handle additional timings Date: Wed, 13 Jun 2012 23:32:19 -0700 Message-ID: <20120614063218.GZ12766@atomide.com> References: <4FD63DBF.9000200@ti.com> <4FD77E35.3050703@ti.com> <20120613113217.GK12766@atomide.com> <20120613124215.GT12766@atomide.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org ([204.13.248.71]:48202 "EHLO mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752274Ab2FNGcY (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jun 2012 02:32:24 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: "Mohammed, Afzal" Cc: "paul@pwsan.com" , "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" , "Hunter, Jon" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" * Mohammed, Afzal [120613 07:09]: > Hi Tony, > > On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 18:12:15, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > > Or should additional timings be achieved without affecting old > > > interface, but that it seems would necessitate more code > > > duplication. > > > > We should just keep the same timings as before, with values > > added for the newly added registers. > > What I understood from above is to get values bootloader used to > set for those new timings & put in Kernel, right ? Yeah and eventually to the .dts files. Tony