From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: "Shilimkar, Santosh" <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Cc: tony@atomide.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Aneesh V <aneesh@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] memory: emif: add device tree support to emif driver
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2012 11:28:30 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120625182830.GA23850@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMQu2gy7oj-+1qCteAFMXEeOL-Wdrs6e4gKWM=HsOukXcPuv-A@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 02:33:11PM +0530, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote:
> @@ -1644,11 +1923,23 @@ static void __attribute__((unused))
> freq_post_notify_handling(void)
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&emif_lock, irq_state);
> }
>
> +#if defined(CONFIG_OF)
> +static const struct of_device_id emif_of_match[] = {
> + { .compatible = "ti,emif-4d" },
> + { .compatible = "ti,emif-4d5" },
> + {},
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, emif_of_match);
> +#endif
> +
> static struct platform_driver emif_driver = {
> .remove = __exit_p(emif_remove),
> .shutdown = emif_shutdown,
> .driver = {
> .name = "emif",
> +#if defined(CONFIG_OF)
> + .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(emif_of_match),
> +#endif
Are these two still #if defined needed?
Also, what about the IS_DEFINED macro?
And, if you resend, please resend the whole series, I don't have the old
ones around anymore.
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-06-25 18:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-14 10:29 [PATCH v3 0/4] dt: device tree support for TI EMIF driver for 3.6 Santosh Shilimkar
2012-06-14 10:29 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] dt: device tree bindings for LPDDR2 memories Santosh Shilimkar
2012-06-14 10:29 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] dt: emif: device tree bindings for TI's EMIF sdram controller Santosh Shilimkar
2012-06-14 10:29 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] arm: dts: EMIF and LPDDR2 device tree data for OMAP4 boards Santosh Shilimkar
2012-06-14 10:29 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] memory: emif: add device tree support to emif driver Santosh Shilimkar
2012-06-14 15:48 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-06-15 7:06 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-06-19 9:03 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-06-25 18:28 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2012-06-26 5:09 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-06-26 5:19 ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-06-26 5:23 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-06-26 5:26 ` Rajendra Nayak
2012-06-26 7:49 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-06-29 13:46 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-06-29 21:07 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-06-29 21:28 ` Jon Hunter
2012-06-30 2:50 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2012-06-30 4:14 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120625182830.GA23850@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=aneesh@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox