From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: "Shilimkar, Santosh" <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Cc: "S, Venkatraman" <svenkatr@ti.com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
Chris Ball <cjb@laptop.org>,
Shubhrajyoti Datta <shubhrajyoti@ti.com>
Subject: Re: rmk back but still recovering (was Re: Reminder - rmk still on vacation)
Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 15:44:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120730144443.GG7405@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMQu2gyxODJb2Kc_AtYPrhwoOvEwQNLkYHvbk3e=UPdgvxdWng@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 04:37:09PM +0200, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 4:33 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux
> <linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> > So I take that as you wanting exactly what is in linux-next merged without
> > any further changes?
>
> Just one patch[1] on top of that so that default omap2plus_defconfig
> keeps working.
Err, I don't see what that patch does. Setting ret=-ENXIO at the
start of the function, when it's subsequently overwritten by:
+ int ret = -ENXIO, irq;
...
ret = omap_hsmmc_gpio_init(pdata);
...
... dma stuff ...
seems absurd.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-30 14:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20120725141222.GA6939@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
2012-07-27 13:42 ` rmk back but still recovering (was Re: Reminder - rmk still on vacation) Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-07-27 15:20 ` Jon Hunter
2012-07-27 15:28 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-07-27 16:08 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-07-27 16:50 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-07-28 8:10 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-07-30 5:51 ` S, Venkatraman
2012-07-30 7:40 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-07-30 8:26 ` Shubhrajyoti Datta
2012-07-30 14:33 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-07-30 14:37 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-07-30 14:44 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2012-07-30 14:46 ` S, Venkatraman
2012-07-30 15:19 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2012-07-30 15:25 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2012-07-30 17:02 ` Tony Lindgren
2012-07-30 17:17 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2012-07-30 14:45 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120730144443.GG7405@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=cjb@laptop.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
--cc=shubhrajyoti@ti.com \
--cc=svenkatr@ti.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).