From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Russell King - ARM Linux Subject: Re: rmk back but still recovering (was Re: Reminder - rmk still on vacation) Date: Mon, 30 Jul 2012 15:45:41 +0100 Message-ID: <20120730144541.GH7405@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20120725141222.GA6939@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20120727134231.GA5934@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20120727165049.GB7405@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]:51863 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754684Ab2G3Op7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jul 2012 10:45:59 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: "Shilimkar, Santosh" Cc: "S, Venkatraman" , Tony Lindgren , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Chris Ball , Shubhrajyoti Datta On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 09:40:27AM +0200, Shilimkar, Santosh wrote: > IMHO, we should merge the OMAP DMA engine support which is now sufficiently > tested and has been in linux-next for some time. Polling mode and ASOC > related issues can be then debugged directly on mainline. > For the time being, the SOC patch which Tony merged in linux-omap > master can be included along with rest of the OMAP DMA engine patches > to have working kernel. BTW, I was referring to the copyright issues which you apparantly raised while I was away. I assume you've dropped those objections now.