From: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
To: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/5] hwrng: OMAP: store per-device data in per-device variables, not file statics
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 17:36:10 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120827233609.15045.38385.stgit@dusk.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120827232922.15045.56522.stgit@dusk.lan>
Encapsulate all of the RNG per-device state into a single per-device
structure record, as opposed to a set of per-driver file variables.
Signed-off-by: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
Cc: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
---
drivers/char/hw_random/omap-rng.c | 115 +++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 77 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/char/hw_random/omap-rng.c b/drivers/char/hw_random/omap-rng.c
index 4fbdceb..e0f0b98 100644
--- a/drivers/char/hw_random/omap-rng.c
+++ b/drivers/char/hw_random/omap-rng.c
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
#include <linux/platform_device.h>
#include <linux/hw_random.h>
#include <linux/delay.h>
+#include <linux/slab.h>
#include <asm/io.h>
@@ -46,26 +47,38 @@
#define RNG_SYSSTATUS 0x44 /* System status
[0] = RESETDONE */
-static void __iomem *rng_base;
-static struct clk *rng_ick;
-static struct platform_device *rng_dev;
+/**
+ * struct omap_rng_private_data - RNG IP block-specific data
+ * @base: virtual address of the beginning of the RNG IP block registers
+ * @clk: RNG clock
+ * @mem_res: struct resource * for the IP block registers physical memory
+ */
+struct omap_rng_private_data {
+ void __iomem *base;
+ struct clk *clk;
+ struct resource *mem_res;
+};
-static inline u32 omap_rng_read_reg(int reg)
+static inline u32 omap_rng_read_reg(struct omap_rng_private_data *priv, int reg)
{
- return __raw_readl(rng_base + reg);
+ return __raw_readl(priv->base + reg);
}
-static inline void omap_rng_write_reg(int reg, u32 val)
+static inline void omap_rng_write_reg(struct omap_rng_private_data *priv,
+ int reg, u32 val)
{
- __raw_writel(val, rng_base + reg);
+ __raw_writel(val, priv->base + reg);
}
static int omap_rng_data_present(struct hwrng *rng, int wait)
{
+ struct omap_rng_private_data *priv;
int data, i;
+ priv = (struct omap_rng_private_data *)rng->priv;
+
for (i = 0; i < 20; i++) {
- data = omap_rng_read_reg(RNG_STAT_REG) ? 0 : 1;
+ data = omap_rng_read_reg(priv, RNG_STAT_REG) ? 0 : 1;
if (data || !wait)
break;
/* RNG produces data fast enough (2+ MBit/sec, even
@@ -80,9 +93,13 @@ static int omap_rng_data_present(struct hwrng *rng, int wait)
static int omap_rng_data_read(struct hwrng *rng, u32 *data)
{
- *data = omap_rng_read_reg(RNG_OUT_REG);
+ struct omap_rng_private_data *priv;
+
+ priv = (struct omap_rng_private_data *)rng->priv;
+
+ *data = omap_rng_read_reg(priv, RNG_OUT_REG);
- return 4;
+ return sizeof(u32);
}
static struct hwrng omap_rng_ops = {
@@ -93,69 +110,85 @@ static struct hwrng omap_rng_ops = {
static int __devinit omap_rng_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
- struct resource *res;
+ struct omap_rng_private_data *priv;
int ret;
- /*
- * A bit ugly, and it will never actually happen but there can
- * be only one RNG and this catches any bork
- */
- if (rng_dev)
- return -EBUSY;
+ priv = kzalloc(sizeof(struct omap_rng_private_data), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!priv) {
+ dev_err(&pdev->dev, "could not allocate memory\n");
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ };
+
+ omap_rng_ops.priv = (unsigned long)priv;
+ dev_set_drvdata(&pdev->dev, priv);
if (cpu_is_omap24xx()) {
- rng_ick = clk_get(&pdev->dev, "ick");
- if (IS_ERR(rng_ick)) {
+ priv->clk = clk_get(&pdev->dev, "ick");
+ if (IS_ERR(priv->clk)) {
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Could not get rng_ick\n");
- ret = PTR_ERR(rng_ick);
+ ret = PTR_ERR(priv->clk);
return ret;
- } else
- clk_enable(rng_ick);
+ } else {
+ clk_enable(priv->clk);
+ }
}
- res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
+ priv->mem_res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
+ if (!priv->mem_res) {
+ ret = -ENOENT;
+ goto err_ioremap;
+ }
- rng_base = devm_request_and_ioremap(&pdev->dev, res);
- if (!rng_base) {
+ priv->base = devm_request_and_ioremap(&pdev->dev, priv->mem_res);
+ if (!priv->base) {
ret = -ENOMEM;
goto err_ioremap;
}
- dev_set_drvdata(&pdev->dev, res);
+ dev_set_drvdata(&pdev->dev, priv);
ret = hwrng_register(&omap_rng_ops);
if (ret)
goto err_register;
dev_info(&pdev->dev, "OMAP Random Number Generator ver. %02x\n",
- omap_rng_read_reg(RNG_REV_REG));
- omap_rng_write_reg(RNG_MASK_REG, 0x1);
+ omap_rng_read_reg(priv, RNG_REV_REG));
+
- rng_dev = pdev;
+ omap_rng_write_reg(priv, RNG_MASK_REG, 0x1);
return 0;
err_register:
- rng_base = NULL;
+ priv->base = NULL;
err_ioremap:
if (cpu_is_omap24xx()) {
- clk_disable(rng_ick);
- clk_put(rng_ick);
+ clk_disable(priv->clk);
+ clk_put(priv->clk);
}
+
+ kfree(priv);
+
return ret;
}
static int __exit omap_rng_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
+ struct omap_rng_private_data *priv = dev_get_drvdata(&pdev->dev);
+
hwrng_unregister(&omap_rng_ops);
- omap_rng_write_reg(RNG_MASK_REG, 0x0);
+ omap_rng_write_reg(priv, RNG_MASK_REG, 0x0);
+
+ iounmap(priv->base);
if (cpu_is_omap24xx()) {
- clk_disable(rng_ick);
- clk_put(rng_ick);
+ clk_disable(priv->clk);
+ clk_put(priv->clk);
}
- rng_base = NULL;
+ release_mem_region(priv->mem_res->start, resource_size(priv->mem_res));
+
+ kfree(priv);
return 0;
}
@@ -164,13 +197,19 @@ static int __exit omap_rng_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
static int omap_rng_suspend(struct device *dev)
{
- omap_rng_write_reg(RNG_MASK_REG, 0x0);
+ struct omap_rng_private_data *priv = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+
+ omap_rng_write_reg(priv, RNG_MASK_REG, 0x0);
+
return 0;
}
static int omap_rng_resume(struct device *dev)
{
- omap_rng_write_reg(RNG_MASK_REG, 0x1);
+ struct omap_rng_private_data *priv = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
+
+ omap_rng_write_reg(priv, RNG_MASK_REG, 0x1);
+
return 0;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-27 23:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-27 23:36 [PATCH 0/5] hwrng/ARM: OMAP: convert to use runtime PM Paul Walmsley
2012-08-27 23:36 ` [PATCH 1/5] ARM: OMAP2/3: hwmod: add RNG integration data Paul Walmsley
2012-09-19 1:13 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-09-19 3:52 ` Paul Walmsley
2012-08-27 23:36 ` Paul Walmsley [this message]
2012-08-27 23:36 ` [PATCH 4/5] ARM: OMAP: split OMAP1, OMAP2+ RNG device registration Paul Walmsley
2012-08-27 23:36 ` [PATCH 3/5] hwrng: OMAP: convert to use runtime PM Paul Walmsley
2012-08-27 23:36 ` [PATCH 5/5] hwrng: OMAP: remove SoC restrictions from driver registration Paul Walmsley
2012-08-30 20:27 ` [PATCH 0/5] hwrng/ARM: OMAP: convert to use runtime PM Tony Lindgren
2012-08-30 20:29 ` Herbert Xu
2012-08-30 20:57 ` Paul Walmsley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120827233609.15045.38385.stgit@dusk.lan \
--to=paul@pwsan.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mpm@selenic.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).