From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Subject: Re: New build warnings Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 14:42:37 +0800 Message-ID: <20120910064236.GB8482@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> References: <20120730164444.GO6802@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20120908083849.GA1603@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20120909191240.GV28643@pengutronix.de> <20120909233333.GA15911@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> <20120910064002.GW28643@pengutronix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from opensource.wolfsonmicro.com ([80.75.67.52]:59790 "EHLO opensource.wolfsonmicro.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751372Ab2IJGmo (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Sep 2012 02:42:44 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120910064002.GW28643@pengutronix.de> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?= Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Liam Girdwood , Arnd Bergmann On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 08:40:02AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-K=F6nig wrote: > Message-id: 201208141241.51379.arnd@arndb.de This is illegible, did the message have a subject line or other content that a human might understand? Just as with commit IDs you should *always* provide a human readable version, message IDs are even worse than commit IDs in this respect. > Mark, you even replied that you applied it!? It wasn't sent to a mail= ing > list though. Well, as I've no idea what you're talking about it's hard for me to take a look. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html