Re: [PATCH] CPUFreq: OMAP: remove unnecessary plat/ includes

["Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>]

On Thursday, September 20, 2012, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> Hi
> 
> On Fri, 14 Sep 2012, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> 
> > On Wednesday, September 12, 2012, Paul Walmsley wrote:
> > > 
> > > Remove some unnecessary plat/ includes that are interfering with multi-subarch
> > > ARM kernels.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>
> > > Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
> > > Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
> > > Acked-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
> > 
> > Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
> > 
> > > ---
> > > 
> > > Still awaiting some final testing here.  Rafael, was wondering if you 
> > > would be willing to ack this so we can merge it via the OMAP tree?   
> > > Otherwise the patch can be split into an OMAP part and a CPUFreq part that 
> > > can go in across two merge windows.
> > > 
> > >  arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock2420_data.c |    1 +
> > >  arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock2430_data.c |    1 +
> > >  arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock3xxx_data.c |    1 +
> > >  arch/arm/mach-omap2/clock44xx_data.c |    1 +
> > >  drivers/cpufreq/omap-cpufreq.c       |   19 +------------------
> > >  5 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> 
> Thanks Rafael.  Looks like you've got "cpufreq: OMAP: Check IS_ERR() 
> instead of NULL for omap_device_get_by_hwmod_name" queued which conflicts 
> with this patch, so will just queue the arch/arm/mach-omap2/ changes for 
> now.  Then the drivers/cpufreq/omap-cpufreq.c part can go in during 3.8.

OK

Thanks,
Rafael