From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tony Lindgren Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: OMAP: Remove plat-omap/common.c Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2012 08:49:02 -0700 Message-ID: <20121102154901.GU15766@atomide.com> References: <20121101224703.2103.95474.stgit@muffinssi.local> <20121101224828.2103.82950.stgit@muffinssi.local> <50936A6E.3020202@ti.com> <5093891D.6070302@ti.com> <50938A69.9040908@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mho-04-ewr.mailhop.org ([204.13.248.74]:24266 "EHLO mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751190Ab2KBPtI (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Nov 2012 11:49:08 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <50938A69.9040908@ti.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Santosh Shilimkar Cc: Tomi Valkeinen , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org * Santosh Shilimkar [121102 01:56]: > On Friday 02 November 2012 02:19 PM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > >On 2012-11-02 08:38, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: > >> > >>Lets not move this in DMA code since the above is really related > >>to frame buffer. It reserves more DMA area for dma_alloc_coherent() > >>etc than default 2 MB. Infact, we should no longer need this with > >>CMA and memblock in place. > >> > >>Tomi, > >>Can we not get rid of the above memory reservation ? > > > >Yes, I think so. This one is only used for the old omapfb, i.e. omap1, > >and I have no means to test it out, though. But below is a patch to > >remove it. I also attached the patch, as it looks like thunderbird wants > >to reformat the pasted patch... I'll remove the > >CONFIG_FB_OMAP_CONSISTENT_DMA_SIZE from the omapfb driver's Kconfig file > >in my tree later. > > > Great !! > Thanks for the patches Tomi. > > For both the patches, feel free add. > Acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar Great thanks, will swap in Tomi's patch. Regards, Tony