From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tony Lindgren Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: OMAP2+: Prevent redefinition errors for soc.h Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2012 16:21:42 -0800 Message-ID: <20121110002142.GC6801@atomide.com> References: <1352477961-7634-1-git-send-email-jon-hunter@ti.com> <20121109162259.GO6801@atomide.com> <509D2F77.6090702@ti.com> <20121109211052.GS6801@atomide.com> <509D94F7.8010707@ti.com> <20121109235006.GB6801@atomide.com> <509D9876.9040301@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mho-03-ewr.mailhop.org ([204.13.248.66]:42345 "EHLO mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751659Ab2KJAVp (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Nov 2012 19:21:45 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <509D9876.9040301@ti.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Jon Hunter Cc: linux-omap , linux-arm * Jon Hunter [121109 15:59]: > > Sorry, I meant in the fixes series I have posted for dmtimer, I am > adding a new function called omap_dm_timer_populate_errata() that is > using cpu_is_xxxx() [1]. I had done this a while back, but now I see > that we want to get away from doing that right? Yes. Looks like everything we have under plat-omap can be moved to live under drivers eventually, so let's not use cpu_is_omap there either. For legacy boot, you can use pdata->timer_capability for passing that? > I was planning on sending you a pull request for that series on Monday > but now I am wondering if I should fix this now or later. I was hoping > this series would make 3.8. Yeah, sounds like that should be fixed though as we still have a bit of time early next week. Regards, Tony > [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=135249008128365&w=2