From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Russell King - ARM Linux Subject: Re: OMAP* Latest build failures Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 15:18:15 +0000 Message-ID: <20121128151814.GZ3332@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <20121114092643.GG3290@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20121117093307.GL3332@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20121120175733.GH18567@atomide.com> <50AC0B83.9070704@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from caramon.arm.linux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]:51903 "EHLO caramon.arm.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755183Ab2K1PX0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Nov 2012 10:23:26 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <50AC0B83.9070704@ti.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Jon Hunter Cc: Tony Lindgren , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Eduardo Valentin , Radhesh Fadnis On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 05:00:19PM -0600, Jon Hunter wrote: > > On 11/20/2012 11:57 AM, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > * Russell King - ARM Linux [121117 01:35]: > >> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 09:26:43AM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > >>> OMAP* allnoconfig fails: > >>> > >>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/built-in.o: In function `omap_dss_set_min_bus_tput': > >>> twl-common.c:(.text+0x1e08): undefined reference to `omap_pm_set_min_bus_tput' > >>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/built-in.o: In function `omap_hwmod_init_postsetup': > >>> twl-common.c:(.init.text+0x8f8): undefined reference to `omap_pm_if_early_init' > >>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/built-in.o: In function `omap_serial_init_port': > >>> twl-common.c:(.init.text+0x1284): undefined reference to `omap_pm_get_dev_context_loss_count' > >>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/built-in.o: In function `omap_timer_init': > >>> twl-common.c:(.init.text+0x1544): undefined reference to `omap_pm_get_dev_context_loss_count' > >>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/built-in.o: In function `omap2_common_pm_init': > >>> twl-common.c:(.init.text+0x1af0): undefined reference to `omap_pm_if_init' > >>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/built-in.o: In function `omap2_gpio_dev_init': > >>> twl-common.c:(.init.text+0x2168): undefined reference to `omap_pm_get_dev_context_loss_count' > >>> arch/arm/mach-omap2/built-in.o: In function `omap_display_init': > >>> twl-common.c:(.init.text+0x25cc): undefined reference to `omap_pm_get_dev_context_loss_count' > >> > >> These are now gone, but we have a new warning: > >> > >> arch/arm/mach-omap2/timer.c:163:28: warning: 'omap_counter_match' defined but not used > > > > Jon, care to fix this one? > > Fix already available here [1]. I actually included this in my latest > pull request with some other timer clean-ups [2]. Let me know if you are > ok with this being part of this pull request or if you want to handle > this separately. > > Cheers > Jon > > [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=135300866115036&w=2 > [2] http://marc.info/?l=linux-omap&m=135308624321232&w=2 Well, it's now two weeks on, and the warning is still there... what's going on? Why aren't fixes propagating upstream?