From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Samuel Ortiz Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 01/23] mfd: omap-usb-host: get rid of cpu_is_omap..() macros Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 01:54:50 +0100 Message-ID: <20121214005450.GO26699@sortiz-mobl> References: <1355134833-5199-1-git-send-email-rogerq@ti.com> <1355134833-5199-2-git-send-email-rogerq@ti.com> <20121213214949.GH4989@atomide.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20121213214949.GH4989@atomide.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Tony Lindgren Cc: balbi@ti.com, paul@pwsan.com, keshava_mgowda@ti.com, sshtylyov@mvista.com, bjorn@mork.no, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Roger Quadros List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org Hi Tony, On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 01:49:49PM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote: > Hi Samuel, > > * Roger Quadros [121210 02:23]: > > Instead of using cpu_is_omap..() macros in the device driver we > > rely on information provided in the platform data. > > > > The only information we need is whether the USB Host module has > > a single ULPI bypass control bit for all ports or individual bypass > > control bits for each port. OMAP3 REV2.1 and earlier have the former. > > I'd like to apply this patch as a fix so I can finally nuke plat/cpu.h > for omaps by -rc1 before more drivers start using it again. > > That is assuming nobody else is planning on merging this series for > v3.8 presumably. This should go into 3.9, yes. > Want to ack this one? Looks fine to me: Acked-by: Samuel Ortiz Cheers, Samuel. -- Intel Open Source Technology Centre http://oss.intel.com/