From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
To: Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
Cc: "Shilimkar, Santosh" <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>,
Tarun Kanti DebBarma <tarun.kanti@ti.com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>, Benoit <b-cousson@ti.com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>,
Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jon Hunter <jon-hunter@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] OMAP GPIO - don't wake from suspend unless requested.
Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 18:05:53 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20121214180553.5eb62c0c@notabene.brown> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ipblahho.fsf@deeprootsystems.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5007 bytes --]
On Mon, 10 Sep 2012 10:57:07 -0700 Kevin Hilman <khilman@deeprootsystems.com>
wrote:
> OK thanks, I'll queue this up for v3.6-rc as this should qualify as a
> regression.
I don't think this did actually get queued. At least I'm still seeing the
bug in 3.7 and I cannot see a patch in the git history that looks right.
But then I don't remember what we ended up with - it was 3 months ago!!!
This is the last thing I can find in my email history - it still seems to
apply and still seems to work.
NeilBrown
From: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 14:09:06 +1000
Subject: [PATCH] OMAP GPIO - don't wake from suspend unless requested.
Current kernel will wake from suspend on an event an any active
GPIO event if enable_irq_wake() wasn't called.
There are two reasons that the hardware wake-enable bit should be set:
1/ while non-suspended the CPU might go into a deep sleep (off_mode)
in which the wake-enable bit is needed for an interrupt to be
recognised.
2/ while suspended the GPIO interrupt should wake from suspend if and
only if irq_wake as been enabled.
The code currently doesn't keep these two reasons separate so they get
confused and sometimes the wakeup flags is set incorrectly.
This patch reverts:
commit 9c4ed9e6c01e7a8bd9079da8267e1f03cb4761fc
gpio/omap: remove suspend/resume callbacks
and
commit 0aa2727399c0b78225021413022c164cb99fbc5e
gpio/omap: remove suspend_wakeup field from struct gpio_bank
and makes some minor changes so that we have separate flags for "GPIO
should wake from deep idle" and "GPIO should wake from suspend".
With this patch, the GPIO from my touch screen doesn't wake my device
any more, which is what I want.
Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Cc: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
Cc: Benoit Cousson <b-cousson@ti.com>
Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Cc: Tarun Kanti DebBarma <tarun.kanti@ti.com>
Cc: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
Cc: Govindraj.R <govindraj.raja@ti.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
index 4fbc208..79e1340 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c
@@ -57,6 +57,7 @@ struct gpio_bank {
u16 irq;
int irq_base;
struct irq_domain *domain;
+ u32 suspend_wakeup;
u32 non_wakeup_gpios;
u32 enabled_non_wakeup_gpios;
struct gpio_regs context;
@@ -522,11 +523,9 @@ static int _set_gpio_wakeup(struct gpio_bank *bank, int gpio, int enable)
spin_lock_irqsave(&bank->lock, flags);
if (enable)
- bank->context.wake_en |= gpio_bit;
+ bank->suspend_wakeup |= gpio_bit;
else
- bank->context.wake_en &= ~gpio_bit;
-
- __raw_writel(bank->context.wake_en, bank->base + bank->regs->wkup_en);
+ bank->suspend_wakeup &= ~gpio_bit;
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bank->lock, flags);
return 0;
@@ -1157,6 +1156,49 @@ static int __devinit omap_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
#ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP2PLUS
#if defined(CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME)
+
+#if defined(CONFIG_PM_SLEEP)
+static int omap_gpio_suspend(struct device *dev)
+{
+ struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
+ struct gpio_bank *bank = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
+ void __iomem *base = bank->base;
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ if (!bank->mod_usage ||
+ !bank->regs->wkup_en ||
+ !bank->context.wake_en)
+ return 0;
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&bank->lock, flags);
+ _gpio_rmw(base, bank->regs->wkup_en, 0xffffffff, 0);
+ _gpio_rmw(base, bank->regs->wkup_en, bank->suspend_wakeup, 1);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bank->lock, flags);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int omap_gpio_resume(struct device *dev)
+{
+ struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
+ struct gpio_bank *bank = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
+ void __iomem *base = bank->base;
+ unsigned long flags;
+
+ if (!bank->mod_usage ||
+ !bank->regs->wkup_en ||
+ !bank->context.wake_en)
+ return 0;
+
+ spin_lock_irqsave(&bank->lock, flags);
+ _gpio_rmw(base, bank->regs->wkup_en, 0xffffffff, 0);
+ _gpio_rmw(base, bank->regs->wkup_en, bank->context.wake_en, 1);
+ spin_unlock_irqrestore(&bank->lock, flags);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+#endif /* CONFIG_PM_SLEEP */
+
static void omap_gpio_restore_context(struct gpio_bank *bank);
static int omap_gpio_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
@@ -1386,11 +1428,14 @@ static void omap_gpio_restore_context(struct gpio_bank *bank)
}
#endif /* CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME */
#else
+#define omap_gpio_suspend NULL
+#define omap_gpio_resume NULL
#define omap_gpio_runtime_suspend NULL
#define omap_gpio_runtime_resume NULL
#endif
static const struct dev_pm_ops gpio_pm_ops = {
+ SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(omap_gpio_suspend, omap_gpio_resume)
SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS(omap_gpio_runtime_suspend, omap_gpio_runtime_resume,
NULL)
};
[signature.asc application/pgp-signature (828 bytes)]
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 828 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-12-14 7:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20120825214459.7333a376@notabene.brown>
2012-08-26 4:17 ` [PATCH] OMAP GPIO - don't wake from suspend unless requested Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-08-26 22:53 ` NeilBrown
2012-08-27 1:29 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-09-04 5:59 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-09-06 3:05 ` NeilBrown
2012-09-06 5:48 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-09-06 7:02 ` NeilBrown
2012-09-06 7:27 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-09-06 7:51 ` NeilBrown
2012-09-06 8:43 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-09-06 13:26 ` Felipe Balbi
2012-09-10 6:58 ` NeilBrown
2012-09-06 14:11 ` Shubhrajyoti
2012-09-07 21:37 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-09-08 7:55 ` Shilimkar, Santosh
2012-09-10 17:57 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-12-14 7:05 ` NeilBrown [this message]
2012-12-14 9:04 ` anish kumar
2012-12-19 22:20 ` Grant Likely
2013-02-05 19:47 ` Kevin Hilman
2012-09-10 4:10 ` NeilBrown
2012-09-10 18:17 ` Kevin Hilman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20121214180553.5eb62c0c@notabene.brown \
--to=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=b-cousson@ti.com \
--cc=balbi@ti.com \
--cc=grant.likely@secretlab.ca \
--cc=jon-hunter@ti.com \
--cc=khilman@deeprootsystems.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
--cc=tarun.kanti@ti.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).