From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tony Lindgren Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/7] ir-rx51: Handle signals properly Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2012 11:41:16 -0800 Message-ID: <20121214194115.GL4989@atomide.com> References: <1353251589-26143-1-git-send-email-timo.t.kokkonen@iki.fi> <1353251589-26143-2-git-send-email-timo.t.kokkonen@iki.fi> <20121120195755.GM18567@atomide.com> <20121214172809.GT4989@atomide.com> <20121214172616.GC9620@arwen.pp.htv.fi> <50CB7E88.9050207@iki.fi> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mho-04-ewr.mailhop.org ([204.13.248.74]:60662 "EHLO mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932202Ab2LNTlW (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Dec 2012 14:41:22 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <50CB7E88.9050207@iki.fi> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Timo Kokkonen Cc: balbi@ti.com, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org * Timo Kokkonen [121214 11:33]: > On 12/14/12 19:26, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > > > if it's really for PWM, shouldn't we be using drivers/pwm/ ?? > > > > Now that Neil Brown posted the PWM driver for omap, I've been thinking > about whether converting the ir-rx51 into the PWM API would work. Maybe > controlling the PWM itself would be sufficient, but the ir-rx51 uses > also another dmtimer for creating accurate (enough) timing source for > the IR pulse edges. OK. > I haven't tried whether the default 32kHz clock source is enough for > that. Now that I think about it, I don't see why it wouldn't be good > enough. I think it would even be possible to just use the PWM api alone Cool. Regards, Tony