From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@avionic-design.de>
To: "Philip, Avinash" <avinashphilip@ti.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
"Nori, Sekhar" <nsekhar@ti.com>,
"Hebbar, Gururaja" <gururaja.hebbar@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] pwm: pwm-tiehrpwm: Low power sleep support
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 13:30:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130116123026.GA7132@avionic-0098.adnet.avionic-design.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <518397C60809E147AF5323E0420B992E3EA5DF80@DBDE01.ent.ti.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1623 bytes --]
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 12:14:01PM +0000, Philip, Avinash wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 12:38:56, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 06:33:43PM +0530, Philip Avinash wrote:
> > [...]
> > > diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-tiehrpwm.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-tiehrpwm.c
> > [...]
> > > +static int ehrpwm_pwm_suspend(struct device *dev)
> > > +{
> > > + struct ehrpwm_pwm_chip *pc = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> > > +
> > > + ehrpwm_pwm_context_save(pc);
> > > + pm_runtime_put_sync(dev);
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static int ehrpwm_pwm_resume(struct device *dev)
> > > +{
> > > + struct ehrpwm_pwm_chip *pc = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> > > +
> > > + pm_runtime_get_sync(dev);
> > > + ehrpwm_pwm_context_restore(pc);
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> >
> > According to Documentation/power/runtime_pm.txt, the PM core runs the
> > pm_runtime_get_noresume() and pm_runtime_put_sync() before executing the
> > .suspend() and .resume() callbacks. Are you sure you need to call them
> > here explicitly?
>
> I understand the problem of calling pm_runtime_get_sync() from .resume().
> But this has to be called if pwm was running while going to suspend so that
> pwm can continues to run after resume.
Okay. I misread the documentation and/or your patch. The documentation
says that the core calls pm_runtime_get_noresume() before executing the
.suspend() callback so you're not in fact calling it twice. Sorry for
the confusion.
> So I will add check of test_bit(PWMF_ENABLED, &pwm->flags) before
> pm_runtime_get/put_sync calls.
Yes, that sounds reasonable.
Thierry
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-01-16 12:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-10 13:03 [PATCH 0/2] LOW power sleep support for TI PWM submodules Philip Avinash
2013-01-10 13:03 ` [PATCH 1/2] pwm: pwm-tiehrpwm: Low power sleep support Philip Avinash
2013-01-14 7:08 ` Thierry Reding
2013-01-16 12:14 ` Philip, Avinash
2013-01-16 12:30 ` Thierry Reding [this message]
2013-01-10 13:03 ` [PATCH 2/2] pwm: pwm-tiecap: " Philip Avinash
2013-01-14 7:10 ` Thierry Reding
2013-01-16 12:13 ` Philip, Avinash
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130116123026.GA7132@avionic-0098.adnet.avionic-design.de \
--to=thierry.reding@avionic-design.de \
--cc=avinashphilip@ti.com \
--cc=gururaja.hebbar@ti.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nsekhar@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).