From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dan Carpenter Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] staging: tidspbridge: for 3.9 Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 10:25:24 +0300 Message-ID: <20130121072524.GR4584@mwanda> References: <1357810622-1709-1-git-send-email-omar.ramirez@copitl.com> <20130118004746.GA8897@kroah.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com ([141.146.126.69]:31886 "EHLO aserp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750699Ab3AUHZk (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Jan 2013 02:25:40 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130118004746.GA8897@kroah.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Greg Kroah-Hartman Cc: Omar Ramirez Luna , devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, Chen Gang , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 04:47:46PM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 03:36:57AM -0600, Omar Ramirez Luna wrote: > > Patches for staging-next, fixing comments and suggestions provided > > by Chen Gang. > > > > There is an additional scm patch, that removes hardcoded defines > > related to direct register handling for SCM, it was dependent on > > changes that already made it to mainline. > > What is the status on getting this out of the staging tree? What needs > to be done still? > Why can't tidspbridge be built as a module? The Kconfig help files aren't very informative. regards, dan carpenter