From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Christoffer Dall <chris@cloudcar.com>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
"Jeremy C. Andrus" <jeremya@cs.columbia.edu>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] ARM: mm: Fix alloc_init_section bug on LPAE
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2013 17:55:09 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130201175509.GK5151@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1359160318-27068-1-git-send-email-chris@cloudcar.com>
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 12:31:58AM +0000, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> When using LPAE the call to alloc_init_pte is passed then end address
> for the entire 1st level page table region, and the code unluckily ends
> up going over the bounds of the single allocated PTE, which is sad.
>
> This caused LPAE boot on omap5 to crash.
>
> There may be some hidden mystery in the boot code that I'm unaware of
> or it may be assumed that all mappings are always mappable as sections
> on LPAE and therefore omap5 just does something bad, in which case this
> patch isn't the right fix, but I'd be happy to be told the reason.
>
> Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
> Cc: Jeremy C. Andrus <jeremya@cs.columbia.edu>
> Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <chris@cloudcar.com>
> ---
> arch/arm/mm/mmu.c | 12 +++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
> index ce328c7..1cecc99 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
> @@ -603,11 +603,13 @@ static void __init alloc_init_section(pud_t *pud, unsigned long addr,
>
> flush_pmd_entry(p);
> } else {
> - /*
> - * No need to loop; pte's aren't interested in the
> - * individual L1 entries.
> - */
> - alloc_init_pte(pmd, addr, end, __phys_to_pfn(phys), type);
> + unsigned long next;
> +
> + do {
> + next = pmd_addr_end(addr, end);
> + alloc_init_pte(pmd, addr, next, __phys_to_pfn(phys), type);
> + phys += next - addr;
> + } while (pmd++, addr = next, addr != end);
I now noticed your patch (I'm a bit behind with the list). It looks to
me like it should work since next == end with the classic MMU, so we
only go through the loop once.
--
Catalin
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-01 17:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-01-26 0:31 [RFC PATCH] ARM: mm: Fix alloc_init_section bug on LPAE Christoffer Dall
2013-01-26 4:50 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-01-26 6:15 ` Christoffer Dall
2013-02-01 17:55 ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130201175509.GK5151@arm.com \
--to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=chris@cloudcar.com \
--cc=jeremya@cs.columbia.edu \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).