From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
To: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>, Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>,
Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>,
Linux OMAP Mailing List <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM Kernel Mailing List
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC/NOT FOR MERGING 2/3] serial: omap: remove hwmod dependency
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 21:32:37 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130219193237.GA8978@arwen.pp.htv.fi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ppzww1ux.fsf@linaro.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2114 bytes --]
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:16:38AM -0800, Kevin Hilman wrote:
[ ... ]
> The other problem is the where reset is need during runtime. Again,
> what are the specific examples here? The one I can think of off the top
> of my head is I2C, where it's needed in certain error recovery
> scenarios.
right, I still have a theory that it's not needed in that case either,
though I haven't had time to try that out.
> Here, we need a way for the driver itself to initiate a full reset.
> Maybe a new runtime PM hook like ->runtime_reset() as Felipe has
> suggested (though I'm not yet sure runtime PM is the right place for
> this, since it's not strictly related to runtime PM). Or, if these are
right, I agree with you but I couldn't think of a better place. Maybe we
need a reset hook in struct device itself (as I suggested on another
mail) but I'm not sure Greg would take it, unless we have a damn good
reason.
> mostly corner-case, error recovery scenarios, maybe a a way force the
> driver to remove itself and re-probe (which would trigger the
> bus-notifier based reset) as Tony has suggested is the better approach.
I don't think so. We certainly don't need to go through all memory
allocations again. That will just cause unnecessary memory
fragmentation.
> The OMAP I2C driver is doing a reset and fully re-initializing itself,
> so it seems the forced remove/probe is the right approach there. Any
I must disagree here. Doing a reprobe of I2C every time there's an error
condition is overkill. It means freeing struct omap_i2c_dev, freeing its
IRQ, freeing the ioremapped area, changing mux configuration (due to
pinctrl calls) just to do it all over again. Besides omap_i2c_probe()
calls omap_i2c_init() which will do the full IP reset anyway.
The difference is that calling omap_i2c_init() directly doesn't force us
to free and reallocate all resources all over again.
> one have the other use cases handy?
dwc3 gets reset during probe() too, but that has an IP specific reset
which doesn't need SYSCONFIG register for that.
--
balbi
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-02-19 19:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 72+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-02-14 11:15 [RFC/NOT FOR MERGING 1/3] arm: omap: use generic implementation if !od Felipe Balbi
2013-02-14 11:15 ` [RFC/NOT FOR MERGING 2/3] serial: omap: remove hwmod dependency Felipe Balbi
2013-02-14 17:12 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-02-14 17:56 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-02-14 18:12 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-02-14 19:27 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-02-14 19:39 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-02-14 20:47 ` Paul Walmsley
2013-02-14 21:40 ` Paul Walmsley
2013-02-14 22:47 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-02-15 6:46 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-02-15 7:29 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-19 15:30 ` Paul Walmsley
2013-02-19 15:45 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-02-19 16:30 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-02-19 18:22 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-02-19 19:31 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-02-19 19:43 ` hwmod data duplication (was: Re: [RFC/NOT FOR MERGING 2/3] serial: omap: remove hwmod dependency) Felipe Balbi
2013-02-19 22:09 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-02-19 22:22 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-02-19 22:31 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-02-19 22:51 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-02-15 10:26 ` [RFC/NOT FOR MERGING 2/3] serial: omap: remove hwmod dependency Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-02-14 21:56 ` Paul Walmsley
2013-02-14 22:22 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-02-15 6:53 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-02-15 7:27 ` Bedia, Vaibhav
2013-02-19 15:27 ` Paul Walmsley
2013-02-19 16:38 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-02-19 16:57 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-02-19 17:43 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-02-19 18:34 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-02-19 19:16 ` Kevin Hilman
2013-02-19 19:32 ` Felipe Balbi [this message]
2013-02-19 19:50 ` Kevin Hilman
2013-02-19 20:10 ` OMAP reset requirements (was: Re: [RFC/NOT FOR MERGING 2/3] serial: omap: remove hwmod dependency) ^[:x Felipe Balbi
2013-02-19 20:25 ` OMAP reset requirements Kevin Hilman
2013-02-20 6:26 ` [RFC/NOT FOR MERGING 2/3] serial: omap: remove hwmod dependency Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-15 6:44 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-02-15 7:27 ` Bedia, Vaibhav
2013-02-20 17:38 ` Paul Walmsley
2013-02-20 19:16 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-02-20 20:03 ` Paul Walmsley
2013-02-20 20:37 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-02-21 10:16 ` Peter De Schrijver
2013-02-21 12:09 ` Peter Korsgaard
2013-02-15 10:16 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-02-15 13:26 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-15 13:27 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-02-15 13:31 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-15 16:30 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-02-15 16:42 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-02-16 6:01 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-16 8:55 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-02-16 9:17 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-16 9:22 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-02-16 9:31 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-18 15:27 ` Kevin Hilman
2013-02-16 5:31 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-16 5:36 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-02-16 5:48 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-18 8:08 ` Bedia, Vaibhav
2013-02-18 8:28 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-15 15:40 ` Kevin Hilman
2013-02-15 16:03 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-02-16 4:59 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-18 14:52 ` Kevin Hilman
2013-02-14 11:15 ` [RFC/NOT FOR MERGING 3/3] arm: boot: dts: omap: remove ti_hwmods from UART ports Felipe Balbi
2013-02-14 11:20 ` [RFC/NOT FOR MERGING 1/3] arm: omap: use generic implementation if !od Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-02-14 17:57 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-02-15 15:28 ` Kevin Hilman
2013-02-15 16:04 ` Felipe Balbi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130219193237.GA8978@arwen.pp.htv.fi \
--to=balbi@ti.com \
--cc=khilman@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul@pwsan.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox