Linux on ARM based TI OMAP SoCs
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>
To: Kevin Hilman <khilman@linaro.org>
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>, Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com>,
	Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com>,
	Linux OMAP Mailing List <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux ARM Kernel Mailing List
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC/NOT FOR MERGING 2/3] serial: omap: remove hwmod dependency
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 21:32:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130219193237.GA8978@arwen.pp.htv.fi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ppzww1ux.fsf@linaro.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2114 bytes --]

Hi,

On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:16:38AM -0800, Kevin Hilman wrote:

[ ... ]

> The other problem is the where reset is need during runtime.  Again,
> what are the specific examples here?  The one I can think of off the top
> of my head is I2C, where it's needed in certain error recovery
> scenarios.

right, I still have a theory that it's not needed in that case either,
though I haven't had time to try that out.

> Here, we need a way for the driver itself to initiate a full reset.
> Maybe a new runtime PM hook like ->runtime_reset() as Felipe has
> suggested (though I'm not yet sure runtime PM is the right place for
> this, since it's not strictly related to runtime PM).  Or, if these are

right, I agree with you but I couldn't think of a better place. Maybe we
need a reset hook in struct device itself (as I suggested on another
mail) but I'm not sure Greg would take it, unless we have a damn good
reason.

> mostly corner-case, error recovery scenarios, maybe a a way force the
> driver to remove itself and re-probe (which would trigger the
> bus-notifier based reset) as Tony has suggested is the better approach.

I don't think so. We certainly don't need to go through all memory
allocations again. That will just cause unnecessary memory
fragmentation.

> The OMAP I2C driver is doing a reset and fully re-initializing itself,
> so it seems the forced remove/probe is the right approach there.  Any

I must disagree here. Doing a reprobe of I2C every time there's an error
condition is overkill. It means freeing struct omap_i2c_dev, freeing its
IRQ, freeing the ioremapped area, changing mux configuration (due to
pinctrl calls) just to do it all over again. Besides omap_i2c_probe()
calls omap_i2c_init() which will do the full IP reset anyway.

The difference is that calling omap_i2c_init() directly doesn't force us
to free and reallocate all resources all over again.

> one have the other use cases handy?

dwc3 gets reset during probe() too, but that has an IP specific reset
which doesn't need SYSCONFIG register for that.

-- 
balbi

[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2013-02-19 19:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 72+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-02-14 11:15 [RFC/NOT FOR MERGING 1/3] arm: omap: use generic implementation if !od Felipe Balbi
2013-02-14 11:15 ` [RFC/NOT FOR MERGING 2/3] serial: omap: remove hwmod dependency Felipe Balbi
2013-02-14 17:12   ` Tony Lindgren
2013-02-14 17:56     ` Felipe Balbi
2013-02-14 18:12       ` Tony Lindgren
2013-02-14 19:27         ` Felipe Balbi
2013-02-14 19:39           ` Tony Lindgren
2013-02-14 20:47             ` Paul Walmsley
2013-02-14 21:40               ` Paul Walmsley
2013-02-14 22:47                 ` Tony Lindgren
2013-02-15  6:46                   ` Felipe Balbi
2013-02-15  7:29                     ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-19 15:30                   ` Paul Walmsley
2013-02-19 15:45                     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-02-19 16:30                       ` Tony Lindgren
2013-02-19 18:22                         ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-02-19 19:31                           ` Tony Lindgren
2013-02-19 19:43                             ` hwmod data duplication (was: Re: [RFC/NOT FOR MERGING 2/3] serial: omap: remove hwmod dependency) Felipe Balbi
2013-02-19 22:09                               ` Tony Lindgren
2013-02-19 22:22                                 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-02-19 22:31                                   ` Tony Lindgren
2013-02-19 22:51                                     ` Felipe Balbi
2013-02-15 10:26                 ` [RFC/NOT FOR MERGING 2/3] serial: omap: remove hwmod dependency Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-02-14 21:56               ` Paul Walmsley
2013-02-14 22:22               ` Tony Lindgren
2013-02-15  6:53                 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-02-15  7:27                   ` Bedia, Vaibhav
2013-02-19 15:27                 ` Paul Walmsley
2013-02-19 16:38                   ` Tony Lindgren
2013-02-19 16:57                     ` Felipe Balbi
2013-02-19 17:43                       ` Tony Lindgren
2013-02-19 18:34                         ` Felipe Balbi
2013-02-19 19:16                     ` Kevin Hilman
2013-02-19 19:32                       ` Felipe Balbi [this message]
2013-02-19 19:50                         ` Kevin Hilman
2013-02-19 20:10                           ` OMAP reset requirements (was: Re: [RFC/NOT FOR MERGING 2/3] serial: omap: remove hwmod dependency) ^[:x Felipe Balbi
2013-02-19 20:25                             ` OMAP reset requirements Kevin Hilman
2013-02-20  6:26                       ` [RFC/NOT FOR MERGING 2/3] serial: omap: remove hwmod dependency Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-15  6:44               ` Felipe Balbi
2013-02-15  7:27                 ` Bedia, Vaibhav
2013-02-20 17:38                 ` Paul Walmsley
2013-02-20 19:16                   ` Felipe Balbi
2013-02-20 20:03                     ` Paul Walmsley
2013-02-20 20:37                     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-02-21 10:16                     ` Peter De Schrijver
2013-02-21 12:09                       ` Peter Korsgaard
2013-02-15 10:16               ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-02-15 13:26                 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-15 13:27                   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-02-15 13:31                     ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-15 16:30                       ` Tony Lindgren
2013-02-15 16:42                         ` Felipe Balbi
2013-02-16  6:01                           ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-16  8:55                             ` Felipe Balbi
2013-02-16  9:17                               ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-16  9:22                                 ` Felipe Balbi
2013-02-16  9:31                                   ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-18 15:27                               ` Kevin Hilman
2013-02-16  5:31                         ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-16  5:36                         ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-02-16  5:48                           ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-18  8:08                             ` Bedia, Vaibhav
2013-02-18  8:28                               ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-15 15:40   ` Kevin Hilman
2013-02-15 16:03     ` Felipe Balbi
2013-02-16  4:59     ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-02-18 14:52       ` Kevin Hilman
2013-02-14 11:15 ` [RFC/NOT FOR MERGING 3/3] arm: boot: dts: omap: remove ti_hwmods from UART ports Felipe Balbi
2013-02-14 11:20 ` [RFC/NOT FOR MERGING 1/3] arm: omap: use generic implementation if !od Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-02-14 17:57   ` Felipe Balbi
2013-02-15 15:28 ` Kevin Hilman
2013-02-15 16:04   ` Felipe Balbi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130219193237.GA8978@arwen.pp.htv.fi \
    --to=balbi@ti.com \
    --cc=khilman@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=paul@pwsan.com \
    --cc=tony@atomide.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox