linux-omap.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
To: Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com>
Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>,
	Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@arm.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@samsung.com>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	"linux-sh@vger.kernel.org" <linux-sh@vger.kernel.org>,
	Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
	Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@gmail.com>,
	"rob.herring@calxeda.com" <rob.herring@calxeda.com>,
	"linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org"
	<linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org>,
	Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au>,
	John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>,
	Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@arm.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: convert arm/arm64 arch timer to use CLKSRC_OF init
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 23:07:30 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130325230730.GA5518@MacBook-Pro.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5150C16A.3040208@gmail.com>

On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 09:28:10PM +0000, Rob Herring wrote:
> On 03/25/2013 12:26 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 11:06:47AM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
> >> On TC2 this series leads to using the vexpress 24MHz clock as the sched clock
> >> in preference to the architected timer:
> >>
> >>   Architected local timer running at 24.00MHz (virt).
> >>   Switching to timer-based delay loop
> >>   Registered arch_counter_get_cntvct+0x0/0x14 as sched_clock source
> >>   sched_clock: 32 bits at 24MHz, resolution 41ns, wraps every 178956ms
> >>   Registered versatile_read_sched_clock+0x0/0x28 as sched_clock source
> >>
> >> As they both have the same frequency, neither overrides the other, and
> >> whichever gets registered last is used as the sched_clock. As accesses
> >> to the architected timer are going to have a much lower overhead, this
> >> isn't very nice (and it could be better to use it even if it had a lower
> >> frequency).
> > 
> > I'll remind people that sched_clock() is supposed to be functional at
> > the point in the boot sequence where the call to sched_init() is called.
> > That is after setup_arch() and *before* time_init() is called.
> 
> I count integrator-cp, realview, versatile and non-DT VExpress that do
> this (not surprisingly) and 25 platforms or timer implementations plus
> arm64 that do sched_clock setup in time_init.

Before time_init(), sched_clock() currently returns 0 with the
architected timers (though I don't particularly like this for arm64).
Marc Rutland has patches to make arch_timer_read_counter() a function
which always returns the virtual counter. It requires the CNTVOFF
register to be set to 0 on AArch32 during boot. But this way
sched_clock() on arm64 would always return meaningful values as we have
the architected timers.

-- 
Catalin

  parent reply	other threads:[~2013-03-25 23:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-03-20 22:34 [PATCH] ARM: convert arm/arm64 arch timer to use CLKSRC_OF init Rob Herring
2013-03-21 11:06 ` Mark Rutland
2013-03-21 11:35   ` Marc Zyngier
2013-03-21 12:52   ` Rob Herring
2013-03-25 17:26   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-03-25 21:28     ` Rob Herring
2013-03-25 22:36       ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-03-25 22:53         ` John Stultz
2013-03-26  2:19           ` Rob Herring
2013-03-26  9:56           ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-03-25 23:07       ` Catalin Marinas [this message]
2013-04-23 21:23 ` [PATCH] ARM: OMAP: remove unused variable Arnd Bergmann
2013-04-23 21:26   ` Tony Lindgren

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20130325230730.GA5518@MacBook-Pro.local \
    --to=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=Mark.Rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=Will.Deacon@arm.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=horms@verge.net.au \
    --cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
    --cc=kgene.kim@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=magnus.damm@gmail.com \
    --cc=rob.herring@calxeda.com \
    --cc=robherring2@gmail.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tony@atomide.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).