From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tony Lindgren Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/28] OMAP: DSS related board file changes Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 09:57:53 -0700 Message-ID: <20130328165752.GX10155@atomide.com> References: <1364474962-20439-1-git-send-email-tomi.valkeinen@ti.com> <51546259.3000704@compulab.co.il> <51547462.3070803@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org ([204.13.248.72]:13475 "EHLO mho-02-ewr.mailhop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755610Ab3C1Q54 (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Mar 2013 12:57:56 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <51547462.3070803@ti.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Tomi Valkeinen Cc: Igor Grinberg , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, Archit Taneja , Dmitry Lifshitz * Tomi Valkeinen [130328 09:53]: > On 2013-03-28 17:31, Igor Grinberg wrote: > > On 03/28/13 14:48, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > > > > I've missed this discussion, can you please point to it? > > Well, not so much discussion, but a few mails under "Display related > board specific boot args" subject on l-o. I proposed a board specific > kernel argument to select the displays present, Tony was less than > enthusiastic about that. If we can come up with a Linux generic command line option to select the panel that can be supported also in the long run, I have no objections to that naturally. What I'm against is a temporary custom cmdline option until the board-*.c files go away as we don't want to support it in the long run. Regards, Tony