From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vinod Koul Subject: Re: [RFC v2] dmaengine: omap-dma: Start DMA without delay for cyclic channels Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2013 12:56:00 +0530 Message-ID: <20130409072600.GA31193@intel.com> References: <1364987862-14597-1-git-send-email-peter.ujfalusi@ti.com> <51626D88.8020809@ti.com> <20130408170956.GX30923@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> <20130408171519.GP10155@atomide.com> <5163BAA8.7040502@ti.com> <5163C103.8020101@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5163C103.8020101@ti.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Peter Ujfalusi Cc: Santosh Shilimkar , Tony Lindgren , Russell King - ARM Linux , Dan Williams , Jarkko Nikula , Felipe Balbi , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Peter Meerwald List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 09:19:31AM +0200, Peter Ujfalusi wrote: > On 04/09/2013 08:52 AM, Santosh Shilimkar wrote: > >> I suggest Peter resend the patch with also Grant + Linus W cc:d so > >> they can queue it unless there are other related patches pending > >> somewhere else. > >> > > Am curious on your suggestion. DMA engine patches are going via Vin= od > > Koul's tree so I think the $subject patch should follow the same > > tree, No ? >=20 > AFAIK Vinod should be the correct person to pick it up, but I can CC = Grant and > Linus W as well. Yes it should go thru dmaengine tree, sorry was travelling hence the de= lay, pls resend the patch and I will do the needful >=20 > > Peter, if you plan to re-send, feel free to add my ack. >=20 > I'll figure out which stable release should have this applied and wil= l resend. >=20 > --=20 > P=E9ter