From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tony Lindgren Subject: Re: [RFC 0/4] Cleanup PRM and CM regbit headers Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2013 00:03:48 -0700 Message-ID: <20130705070347.GP5523@atomide.com> References: <1372076143-12955-1-git-send-email-rnayak@ti.com> <20130625071428.GC5523@atomide.com> <51C95839.6050307@ti.com> <20130704115819.GJ5523@atomide.com> <51D56743.9080800@ti.com> <51D65CE8.4050004@ti.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from mho-03-ewr.mailhop.org ([204.13.248.66]:52286 "EHLO mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751222Ab3GEHDx (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Jul 2013 03:03:53 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <51D65CE8.4050004@ti.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Rajendra Nayak Cc: Paul Walmsley , "benoit.cousson@gmail.com" , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org * Rajendra Nayak [130704 22:49]: > On Thursday 04 July 2013 10:14 PM, Paul Walmsley wrote: > > You mentioned that these patches were generated with some kind of a= wk/grep=20 > > scripting. Can you integrate that in an automated way into the=20 > > autogeneration flow? If the answer is yes, then keep the header. = If the=20 > > answer is no, then the header should be dropped. Beno=C3=AEt, mayb= e you have=20 > > an opinion too? >=20 > Ok, I'll try and integrate those scripts so all this can be done in a= n > automated way even for newer SoCs. >=20 > >=20 > > As far as whether this should go in -rcX or not, my view is that, a= s a=20 > > matter of policy, large changes like this should wait until v3.12. = Now,=20 > > having written that, I also was under the impression that the OMAP5= =20 > > changes weren't going to be sent upstream unless the total diffstat= would=20 > > be balanced to roughly zero or negative lines. As far as I know, t= hat=20 > > didn't happen. So I guess, v3.11-rc it is... kernel development b= y=20 > > diffstat :-( >=20 > I don't mind these going in -rcX or 3.12, either way is fine. Removal of unused code should be OK for the early -rc. I doubt that anybody would object it especially considering that's it's a huge pile of unused defines that most likely won't ever be needed for DT based booting. =20 > > Finally, please repost the whole series once you're done with your=20 > > changes, as a non-RFC, along with your pull request (if you plan to= send=20 > > one). I guess I should be the one to take these, since I wound up = taking=20 > > the OMAP5 addition... >=20 > :) I thought so too that you should be the one sending the pull. > I will post these out as non-RFC after I do a clean integration into > the autogen scripts, and then you can take a call on sending the pull= for > either -rcX or 3.12 I'd prefer to have it done now for the early -rc series. But if it drags on, we should not merge it during the -rc series. Regards, Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html