From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tony Lindgren Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] N900: add device tree Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2013 00:36:55 -0700 Message-ID: <20130812073654.GE7656@atomide.com> References: <20130704171939.GA27374@blackmetal.musicnaut.iki.fi> <20130704202145.GB10752@amd.pavel.ucw.cz> <20130704203256.GB27374@blackmetal.musicnaut.iki.fi> <20130713121709.GC16473@amd.pavel.ucw.cz> <20130714222819.GB3296@blackmetal.musicnaut.iki.fi> <20130728134409.GB5382@amd.pavel.ucw.cz> <20130801234355.GA15611@amd.pavel.ucw.cz> <20130810110955.GA11437@amd.pavel.ucw.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mho-03-ewr.mailhop.org ([204.13.248.66]:39371 "EHLO mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754231Ab3HLHhK (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Aug 2013 03:37:10 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Jiri Kosina Cc: Pavel Machek , Belisko Marek , Aaro Koskinen , Olof Johansson , Arnd Bergmann , Andrew Morton , b-cousson@ti.com, pali.rohar@gmail.com, kernel list , linux-arm-kernel , "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" * Jiri Kosina [130810 13:36]: > On Sat, 10 Aug 2013, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > [I wonder if this is clean-enough cause for "trivial in resubmit > > mode?] > > On Sat, 10 Aug 2013, Belisko Marek wrote: > > > Same for gta04 (omap3 based device) [1]. > > It was send upstream 2 times and second time there is no reply from 1.3.2013. > > Hi guys, > > once I am able to match signoffs in the patches to MAINTAINERS, I can take > those through trivial.git in "re-transmission mode" (or feeeding those > thgough akpm si an option as well). > > Please just send the patches to me in a new thread properly with all the > Acks/Signoffs, and mark those appropriately (i.e. maintainer that would > normally push this upstream desurfaced). Sorry for the delays, I think Benoit is still on vacation. Plus the non-functioning email address issue certainly does not help.. Anyways, let's just let Benoit queue these to avoid pointless merge conflicts with the .dts files as discussed several times earlier. Regards, Tony