From: "Pali Rohár" <pali.rohar@gmail.com>
To: "Ивайло Димитров" <freemangordon@abv.bg>,
"Dave Martin" <Dave.Martin@arm.com>,
tony@atomide.com, nm@ti.com
Cc: linux@arm.linux.org.uk, aaro.koskinen@iki.fi,
pdeschrijver@nvidia.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
santosh.shilimkar@ti.com, pavel@ucw.cz,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] ARM: OMAP: Add secure function omap_smc3() which calling instruction smc #1
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2013 10:10:29 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201309041010.30090@pali> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2121638991.49538.1376246200421.JavaMail.apache@mail81.abv.bg>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 3690 bytes --]
On Sunday 11 August 2013 20:36:40 Ивайло Димитров wrote:
> >-------- Оригинално писмо --------
> >
> >От: Dave Martin
> >Относно: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] ARM: OMAP: Add secure function
> >omap_smc3() which
>
> calling instruction smc #1
>
> >До: Pali Rohár
> >Изпратено на: Понеделник, 2013, Август 5 16:29:44 EEST
> >
> >On Sun, Aug 04, 2013 at 10:45:00AM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote:
> >> Here is new version (v3) of omap secure part patch:
> >>
> >> Other secure functions omap_smc1() and omap_smc2() calling
> >> instruction smc #0 but Nokia RX-51 board needs to call
> >> smc #1 for PPA access.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Ivaylo Dimitrov
> >> Signed-off-by: Pali Rohár
> >> ---
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-secure.h
> >> b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-secure.h index
> >> 0e72917..c4586f4 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-secure.h
> >> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-secure.h
> >> @@ -51,6 +51,7 @@
> >>
> >> extern u32 omap_secure_dispatcher(u32 idx, u32 flag, u32
> >> nargs,
> >>
> >> u32 arg1, u32 arg2, u32 arg3, u32 arg4);
> >>
> >> extern u32 omap_smc2(u32 id, u32 falg, u32 pargs);
> >>
> >> +extern u32 omap_smc3(u32 id, u32 process, u32 flag, u32
> >> pargs);
> >>
> >> extern phys_addr_t omap_secure_ram_mempool_base(void);
> >> extern int omap_secure_ram_reserve_memblock(void);
> >>
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-smc.S
> >> b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-smc.S index f6441c1..7bbc043
> >> 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-smc.S
> >> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/omap-smc.S
> >> @@ -1,9 +1,11 @@
> >>
> >> /*
> >>
> >> - * OMAP44xx secure APIs file.
> >> + * OMAP34xx and OMAP44xx secure APIs file.
> >>
> >> *
> >> * Copyright (C) 2010 Texas Instruments, Inc.
> >> * Written by Santosh Shilimkar
> >> *
> >>
> >> + * Copyright (C) 2012 Ivaylo Dimitrov
> >> + * Copyright (C) 2013 Pali Rohár
> >>
> >> *
> >> * This program is free software,you can redistribute it
> >> and/or modify * it under the terms of the GNU General
> >> Public License version 2 as
> >>
> >> @@ -54,6 +56,23 @@ ENTRY(omap_smc2)
> >>
> >> ldmfd sp!, {r4-r12, pc}
> >>
> >> ENDPROC(omap_smc2)
> >>
> >> +/**
> >> + * u32 omap_smc3(u32 service_id, u32 process_id, u32
> >> flag, u32 pargs) + * Low level common routine for secure
> >> HAL and PPA APIs via smc #1 + * r0 - @service_id: Secure
> >> Service ID
> >> + * r1 - @process_id: Process ID
> >> + * r2 - @flag: Flag to indicate the criticality of
> >> operation + * r3 - @pargs: Physical address of parameter
> >> list + */
> >> +ENTRY(omap_smc3)
> >> + stmfd sp!, {r4-r11, lr}
> >> + mov r12, r0 @ Copy the secure service ID
> >> + mov r6, #0xff @ Indicate new Task call
> >> + dsb @ Memory Barrier
> >
> >Can you explain _why_ the barrier is there? The reader
> >doesn't need to be told that a barrier instruction is a
> >barrier instruction.
> >
> >Cheers
> >---Dave
>
> Hi Dave,
>
> Would quoting Santosh's explanation "DSBs were needed on OMAP
> for power sequencing." do the job? Something like "@ Needed
> on OMAP for power sequencing" instead of "@ Memory Barrier".
>
> I want to be sure I correctly understand your requirement.
>
> Regards,
> Ivo
Hello,
I'd like to know what happened with this patch? What is needed
for including it into mainline? Note that without with this patch
series Thumb-2 user space binaries crashing.
--
Pali Rohár
pali.rohar@gmail.com
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-04 8:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-11 18:36 [PATCH v3 1/2] ARM: OMAP: Add secure function omap_smc3() which calling instruction smc #1 Ивайло Димитров
2013-09-04 8:10 ` Pali Rohár [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-09-04 12:43 Dave Martin
2013-07-11 19:43 [PATCH v2 " Ивайло Димитров
2013-07-11 19:54 ` Santosh Shilimkar
2013-07-12 10:24 ` Dave Martin
2013-08-04 8:45 ` [PATCH v3 " Pali Rohár
2013-08-05 13:29 ` Dave Martin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201309041010.30090@pali \
--to=pali.rohar@gmail.com \
--cc=Dave.Martin@arm.com \
--cc=aaro.koskinen@iki.fi \
--cc=freemangordon@abv.bg \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=nm@ti.com \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=pdeschrijver@nvidia.com \
--cc=santosh.shilimkar@ti.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).