From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pali =?utf-8?q?Roh=C3=A1r?= Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] usb: musb: Call atomic_notifier_call_chain when status is changed Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 17:56:12 +0200 Message-ID: <201309181756.12782@pali> References: <1378630239-10006-1-git-send-email-pali.rohar@gmail.com> <20130918133025.GB2953@amd.pavel.ucw.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart8313442.1feUBW3l9A"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Javier Martinez Canillas Cc: Pavel Machek , Felipe Balbi , Tony Lindgren , Anton Vorontsov , Russell King , David Woodhouse , Greg Kroah-Hartman , freemangordon@abv.bg, Aaro Koskinen , "linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , Linux Kernel , linux-usb@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org --nextPart8313442.1feUBW3l9A Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wednesday 18 September 2013 15:57:13 Javier Martinez Canillas=20 wrote: > to split the patch in two since the patch was solving > two separate issues My patch does not solving *two* issues. It is *one* regression=20 and both parts of patch are needed for fixing it. Read commit=20 message again. It does not make sense to split patch fixing kernel=20 regression into more one line patches - or please clarify why. =2D-=20 Pali Roh=C3=A1r pali.rohar@gmail.com --nextPart8313442.1feUBW3l9A Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAlI5zRwACgkQi/DJPQPkQ1J/2QCgtFQe8mTu4aIHC5OhRIbOy+ai j+kAoLhlbffqZMhNXyb2DrhOLlJaNZof =G+Io -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart8313442.1feUBW3l9A--