From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
To: Rob Landley <rob@landley.net>
Cc: "Nicolas Pitre" <nico@fluxnic.net>,
"Måns Rullgård" <mans@mansr.com>, "Andrew Morton" <akpm@osdl.org>,
"Trivial patch monkey" <trivial@kernel.org>,
"Catalin Marinas" <Catalin.Marinas@arm.com>,
"Will Deacon" <will.deacon@arm.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Pavel Machek" <pavel@ucw.cz>,
"linux-omap@vger.kernel.org" <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: new binutils needed for arm in 3.12-rc1
Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2013 21:44:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20130925204432.GW25647@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1380122586.1974.84@driftwood>
On Wed, Sep 25, 2013 at 10:23:06AM -0500, Rob Landley wrote:
> On 09/24/2013 09:07:57 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
>> It could be as simple as making gas accept an extra argument for
>> instructions like dsb and just ignoring it.
>
> So you prefer I come up with the reversion patches locally and _not_
> send them upstream?
This is a silly attitude. What you're effectively saying is that we
are never allowed to use any future ARM instructions in any Linux
kernel because that might break your precious assembler.
I've got news for you. We're *not* going to listen to that argument.
END OF DISCUSSION (everything else is just a waste of time.)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-09-25 20:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-09-19 9:30 3.12-rc1: no longer compiles for Nokia n900 (omap based) Pavel Machek
2013-09-19 9:36 ` Will Deacon
2013-09-19 9:57 ` Pavel Machek
2013-09-23 23:59 ` new binutils needed for arm in 3.12-rc1 Pavel Machek
2013-09-24 2:13 ` Rob Landley
2013-09-24 12:11 ` Måns Rullgård
2013-09-24 21:23 ` Rob Landley
2013-09-24 21:48 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2013-09-25 1:13 ` Rob Landley
2013-09-25 2:07 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-09-25 15:23 ` Rob Landley
2013-09-25 15:52 ` Måns Rullgård
2013-09-26 0:10 ` Rob Landley
2013-09-26 22:24 ` Måns Rullgård
2013-09-25 16:13 ` Nicolas Pitre
2013-09-26 22:48 ` Rob Landley
2013-09-27 19:41 ` Pavel Machek
2013-09-28 8:43 ` Pavel Machek
2013-09-25 20:44 ` Russell King - ARM Linux [this message]
2013-09-25 20:49 ` Måns Rullgård
2013-09-26 22:50 ` Rob Landley
2013-09-26 7:18 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2013-09-28 9:03 ` richard -rw- weinberger
2013-09-24 2:20 ` Rob Landley
2013-09-19 9:44 ` 3.12-rc1: no longer compiles for Nokia n900 (omap based), display no longer works Pavel Machek
2013-09-19 18:47 ` Aaro Koskinen
2013-09-26 0:23 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20130925204432.GW25647@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk \
--to=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=Catalin.Marinas@arm.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mans@mansr.com \
--cc=nico@fluxnic.net \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=rob@landley.net \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=trivial@kernel.org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).