From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] dma: cppi41: more suspend/resume patches Date: Wed, 9 Oct 2013 08:41:24 +0200 Message-ID: <20131009064124.GA3529@linutronix.de> References: <1380634271-27588-1-git-send-email-zonque@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Return-path: Received: from www.linutronix.de ([62.245.132.108]:46357 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754736Ab3JIGl1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 9 Oct 2013 02:41:27 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1380634271-27588-1-git-send-email-zonque@gmail.com> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Daniel Mack Cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, neumann@teufel.de, vinod.koul@intel.com, dan.j.williams@intel.com, balbi@ti.com * Daniel Mack | 2013-10-01 15:31:08 [+0200]: >Patch #1 restores more registers on resume time. > >Patch #2 is a cosmetic cleanup that emerged while digging through the >driver and gaining a basic idea of how it's implemented. Nothing fancy. I'm fine with those two. > >Patch #3, however, gives me headaches. I can't fully explain what's >going on, but I can tell for sure that if fixes a problem that I stared >on for many hours. I'm still trying to verify if it breaks something or not. So I haven't forgotten about this. Sebastian